Re: [Nettime-bold] (no subject)

[--------------------l@ctrlaltdel.org]

----------------------------------------------
253f
indifference
577b
indifference
912u
indifference
----------------------------------------------
simulation = boredom
simulation- art = hyperboredom
? borders net.art = peppi & kokki
----------------------------------------------

integer@www.god-emil.dk wrote:

> du = obv!ouzl! 01 lo.tekk ueztrn !mbez!l
>
> >>alex galloway wrote:
> >>why is Barneys [barneys.com] not art but Etoy is?
> >>they both have a corporate aesthetic.
> >
> >no art responds:
> >both are suspect... the first is obvious because its
> >essential function is in the service of capital
> >selling a elevated class station and supposed status
> >to anyone who is caught offgaurd and/or sleeping.  the
> >second is a little more subdued.  etoy seems to
> >forsake any vital trangressive energies it might have
> >most obviously by its eventual compliance into a
> >certain "cult of personality"; not unlike barneys in
> >selling a product of "lifestyle" that basically
> >equates into a new liberal-left vogue or "simulated
> >act of transgression".  both barneys and etoy tell
> >lies only one does this under the guise of
> >establishment and the other under the guise of
> >anti-establishment.
> >
> >neither offer new models nor suggest other systems of
> >management outside this system. in fact both are
> >clever methods of incorporation into the established
> >system (accelerated capitalism).
> >
> >etoy is arguably more detrimental to artists because
> >it offers a new space for further capitalist growth
> >and acquisition under the premise of the
> >"avant-garde".  in certain ways etoy operates on the
> >same level of the new dot.com scene: relaxed
> >workspace, casual-hip attire, a high level of formal
> >education, liberal politics... all elements of some
> >new-mythos to further compliment, comfort and further
> >seduce the worker and hyper-extend her energies of
> >production far beyond the designated "work-space".
> >
> >twhid from mteww.com stated in a previous post
> >something to the effect of, "art isn't cool or hip or
> >always pleasing".  it is interesting and appropriate
> >statement from someone who is an artist supporting his
> >work via a dot.com and coming to the eventual terms of
> >its increasing madness upon the autonomous "act of the
> >corporate" instead of the preferred scenario of
> >vice-versa.  this skirts a serious problem with the
> >"artworld" (this online ghetto included).  there are
> >too many artists here that are too easy to get along
> >with.  it makes me happy to know "zero one dot org"
> >and brad brace both lurk out there somewhere...
> >
> >-na
> >
> >
> >=====
> >////////////////////////////////////////////
> >*PLEASE DO NOT GO TO YAHOO.COM
> >*DON'T CLICK ON BANNERS EVER AGAIN
> >*CAPITAL & EXCHANGE ARE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PSYCHE
> >--INSTEAD GO TO:
> >http://www.artnetweb.com/peppermint
> >////////////////////////////////////////////
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites.
> >http://invites.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Nettime-bold mailing list
> >Nettime-bold@nettime.org
> >http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nettime-bold mailing list
> Nettime-bold@nettime.org
> http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold

--

lfoundation unsearch v 1.09
date---> Fri 31 march 00 14:55:49 +0100
url---> http://lfoundation.org/unsearch.html



_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold