| Dan Mitchell on Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:00:32 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [Nettime-bold] Re: Deja move 'complete' (sequel to "huh?") |
>If after all this time no one has figured out how/where to archive all this >material, then perhaps one should look to whomever (if anyone) who is >actually responsible for the Usenet rather than knee-jerking without two >clues . . . It's the Tri-lateral Commission, isn't it Mark? At 01:19 PM 6/21/00 -0400, [email protected] wrote: >Folks: > >It is now nearly two years since Dejanews.com became Deja.com, complete with >both many press releases about their attempt to build a profitable business >-- which they have not yet accomplished -- and with many outcries about their >"change" in direction (they originally only adopted the Usenet as a handy >database for testing their database software) . . . > >If after all this time no one has figured out how/where to archive all this >material, then perhaps one should look to whomever (if anyone) who is >actually responsible for the Usenet rather than knee-jerking without two >clues . . . > >Best, > >Mark Stahlman > ># distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission ># <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, ># collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets ># more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body ># archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list [email protected] http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold