| underbelly on 30 Oct 2000 00:45:31 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> Nader is important: get rid of him! |
"Mr.Bad" wrote: > > I guess it's possible that there could be an Ebola breakout in the > Supreme Court in the next 4 years that wipes out all the justices. A > Democratic president could then appoint 9 fresh-faced hale and hearty > 25-year-old prochoicers. Assuming they could get through a Republican > Senate, we wouldn't have to worry about Roe v. Wade for another 50 > years or so. Wouldn't that be lovely? > > > I dunno what it is, exactly, that makes you think the 2000 election is > some kind of watershed. But it seems to me that a CRUCIAL election is > one where progressives have a chance to shake some things up. There is > more momentum in the American left right now than there's been in 15 > years. Wasting that by going back under the yoke of the DLC-controlled > Democratic Party would be FOOLISH in the extreme. > > ~Mr. Bad you're not *Bad*; you just don't know how good you've got it under these dems you've so demonized. I guess everyone needs their demons. have fun. _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list [email protected] http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold