integer on 9 Dec 2000 21:02:43 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] [email protected]'s fascism |
>dear nettime moderator(s), > >i'd like to know why you decided to publish such a dumb and aggressive >message like the one by the Lumpenilluminati: nn op!n!e = snafu'z fasc!zm = "dumber" + more "aggressive" alz Lumpenilluminati 0 0 0 || KORPORAT KR!EG MACHT 3k0R KUNST N[>] IMF - the International Meme Fund - shear pathway to the core. - promoting meme development. lokomotion. + reinvestment. - meme sekurity + meme transaktions. [>] ||||||||||||||||||||| rekurrent exc!tat!on || ||||||||eusocial.com � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � pro satisfacer le metro � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � < 0\ zve!te[z]!ztem \1 > > >--------- > > >In a message dated 01/12/00 01:55:16 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] >writes: ><< you could have not >send anything and participate only to those protests which are pure and >uncontaminated. >http://www.0100101110101101.org/PROTEST=PROFIT/ > >> >.cm.rades >As we struggle not to be diverted by your aping of 80's centre left 'new >realism' rhetoric, misguidance and crass over simplification in the above >statement (you just forgot ".......were interested in getting into >power"),which is useful in only exposing your reformist -promotional - >agenda IN AN 'ART' INITIATIVE SUPPOSEDLY SURROUNDING PROTEST OF ALL THINGS ! >Your political identity becomes clear, in its reactionary and non >revolutionary basis....... to say nothing of certain of your people >submitting work to their own initiative........we now see your crowning >predictability in withdrawing from the DEBATE as other people start to >comment ,just in case it jeopardises the provinence,sale price or popularity >of your gimmick cum competition. >As you continue to suppress open and free communications from the Lumpen >illuminates and because of your initial and subsequent acts of JUDGING you >have left us with no other option than to issue the following text to counter >your chronic authoritarianism. > >'The workers are free activists' >The judging panel of the 'no protest no profit' competition, a concept >edited and published against the Lumpen Iluminati,against its prophet and >against its projects,along with all the editors and publishers aware of its >contents,are condemned to capitals punishment.We call on all valiant >insurrectionists wherever they may be in the world to execute this sentence >without delay,so that no one hencefoth will dare insult the sacred beliefs of >the L.I. >Ludo (minister of information to the L.I ) > > >-------end quote > >...and you didn't pubblish our reply "No Murder No Profit" (see next >message), which was indeed an ironical response to these idiots. I don't >understand why these assholes HAVE A RIGHT TO CONDEMN ANYONE TO "CAPITAL >PUNISHMENT" VIA NETTIME, even though they are joking (what a funny game to >wake up in the morning and read that some dement that you have never seen >before have fun to call for your execution!) > >But what i don't frankly understand, even more, is if i decide to reply in >a sarcastic way i don't have a right to see my reply published. They also >accuse us to whithdraw from DEBATE (such a moloch!), whilst indeed are >nettime moderators who are filtering the debate. If you decide to start a >thread i guess you have to publish all the messages relative to that >thread, you cannot filter the messages you prefer, otherwise the debate >turns into a fake. > >i send you again the message No Murder No Profit asking you, whoever you >are, to not filter it. > >best, > >snafu >ps i don't want this message to be published, just the next one. > > >_______________________________________________ >Nettime-bold mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list [email protected] http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold