integer on 11 Dec 2000 13:22:14 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] [ot] [!nt] \n2+0\ !nkompetent zerfz-- |
Eryk Salvaggio <[email protected]> >WE BEGIN WITH THIS ASSUMPTION: > >The exchange between artist to audience is as valid as that >which is more tangible: The transfer of a product or a service. > >An artisan creating any such product must adapt to the >market of the economy for that good or service; therefore, >the artisan should not be expected to survive by simply giving >away his product or skill. > >We may now ask the question: Why is net.art free, when its >creators are not without needs for food, clothing, shelter, >medicine, warmth, or comfort? > >The reality is this: the internet grows more and more commercial >every day, and with it comes the necessity for commercial wealth: >isps cost money, domain registration costs money. Servers cost >money, cable modems cost money, scanners cost money. Increased >traffic brings about increased fees. All of this is set aside >by the artist for the simple goal of creating an environment >for this audience to experience _free and accessible_ artwork >at no cost to the viewer. Internet Art is merely an extremely >expensive gift. > >The reward for this is of course equal to that which is demanded. >Nothing. > >I have spent five years as an original member of a community and >as a founding artist of the form now known as internet art. [Yes, >its true: one38.org was founded in 1997; I have projects which >date to 1996.] > >In that period, artists have questioned how to survive through >the work, to make a meager set of earnings so that we may >continue to do the work. I have often criticized these attempts >because they paid too much heed to institutions which existed. >The discussion was not, "How do we survive?" but "How do we as >artists get credibility, academic interest, museum attention?" > >That has come: Now, a handful of founding artists are getting >paid. They are, unfortunately, not getting paid for their work, >but rather, paid for the presentation of their work, and even >this is a meager compensation for the amount of people who see >the work on a daily basis. > >NOW, WE MUST FACE THE LOGICAL PROGRESSION: > >We have created a situation where the collective work is valued >at zero. There is an abundance of material on the web simply >because it cannot exist without the web. Its creation already >implies its distribution. > >This network has created a new set of institutions which thrive >on the work that we are creating for free or at cost: The >Whitney Biennial, Rhizome, Doors Of Perception, Nettime, >to name a few. The Webbies, The Walker, SFMOMA. > >What are these institutions created on? The answer is startling: >The mud-solid backs of the artists who support them as >"resources." > > >CIRCUMVENT THE LOGICAL OUTCOMES: > >One38.org is now no longer public. While certain links are >maintained, these will be slowly removed over the course of the >month until the server is completely empty on New Years Day, >2001. > >>From that point on, certain work which has already been donated >to rhizome.org will exist in its artbase. These are the last >donations I can afford to make. > >The future is this: > >One38.org will produce original works of art exclusively for >commission. > >The price for all works will be set at $200.00 and consist of >what is sufficiently "a piece" by the artist; usually running >from 1 to 5 pages of html. > >One38.org will subtract $50.00 for those who will host the work >on a public server for the duration of at least 1 year without >advertisements. It will subtract an additional $50.00 from those >who are private collectors of the artwork. If a work is purchased >by a museum or art gallery, the above is mandatory for the >original price of $200.00. Fellow internet artists which I >determine are of essential caliber who agree to host the work >on their sites are eligible to pay only $75.00. In all cases, >credit must be given to the artist and all work must be unaltered >unless by special, documented proof of consent from the artist. > >The work will be sent via cd-rom with signature in a time >allotted via personal dictates between the artist and the >consumer. > >Breakdown: > >$200.00 starting >$150.00 if consumer provides ad-free hosting of work with credit >for minimum of 1 year. >$100.00 if consumer is private collector. > $75.00 if consumer is fellow net.artist with own domain, isp, >and work online for a period of at least 1 year, who agrees to >host work on server for a period of at least 1 year. > >Additionally, CD-ROMS of one38.org in its current incarnation >will be made available for a cost of $500.00. Anyone >commissioning a new work will receive this volume complimentary >to their original art. > >Questions may be addressed to [email protected] > > > >IN CONCLUSION: > >Free Public Art with no compensation to the artist is a form of >bondage. This is not a matter of copyright; nor is it against the >free exchange of ideas. It is a blow against the exploitation of >the idea-makers by the idea users, a strike against the rampant >exploitation of creativity. This is my extended refusal. prec!z. apropoz. ur koztz = bondage auss!. = ud ztart at $500 m!n. = dze lo.tekk pozer mar!onetz !nfezt!ng d!esz lo.tekk forumz part!kulrl! dze !mbez!l!k art kr!t!kx + gov \ m!l \ korporat zubz!d!szd kret!nz = shl muzt hav 2 pa!. LETZ ZAN!T!ZE!!!!! all korporat mar!onetz \ emplo!kx = 01 zttz target - ! l!ke dzat. am!t!ez.nn pre.konssept!�n meeTz ver!f1kat!�n. - Netochka Nezvanova - we are not advancing. we are retreating f3.MASCHIN3NKUNST - in your direction. m!kro.bl!ss|r|evolut!on|devot!on @www.eusocial.com 17.hzV.tRL.478 e | | +---------- | | < \\----------------+ | n2t | > e _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list [email protected] http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold