Anonymous on Sat Apr 21 00:08:21 2001 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
No Subject |
Realistic? Probable? Are we just painting the devil on the wall? Scenarios are by definition speculative and heuristic. They may help us think more adequately about the future and how to tackle its problems as well as help clarify means-ends relations. The complete absence of such scenarios in the public debate and of publicly available plans for the employment of the EU's rapid reaction force and conflict-management mechanisms are, all said and done, perhaps the most worrying aspects of the militarisation of the EU. What EU leaders construct now, we must live with, pay for and see operate the next 5, 10 or 25 years. None of the present EU activity is indicative of a philosophy, a policy or an organisation aimed at early warning, violence-prevention and peace with peaceful means. If European leaders put all their prestige and 95 per cent of the conflict-management funds and human resources into the build-up of military intervention forces, the civilian measures are destined to be the weaker element. They will come in after the weapons have been used by the conflicting parties and by the US/NATO/EU, when war-torn societies need to be re-constructed (the Kosovo experience). In short, today's mainstream thoughts on conflict-management are likely to permit, if not create, cycles of violence and counter-violence, locally and globally. Europeans have a right to know and discuss before it is implemented. The next six months up to the June EU Summit in Gothenburg, Sweden, is the right time to push for an open debate, to get the facts, to debate in the media and to dialogue with decision-makers about peace in Europe and European peacemaking. And about alternatives to it. We saw violence in Seattle, Prague and Nice. The concern about Europe's militarisation and the presentation of possible and desirable alternatives can only be expressed nonviolently with dignity and solid arguments. Protesters who use violence because they lack creativity and a commitment to nonviolence have no moral capital to persuade politicians who lack creativity and promote violent conflict-management about the virtues of nonviolence! _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list [email protected] http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold