[Nettime-bold] THE HACKTIVISMO DECLARATION

["ricardo dominguez" <rdom@thing.net>]

THE HACKTIVISMO DECLARATION

                 _ _
                 ((___)) cDc communications
                 [ x x ] & HACKTIVISMO
                 \ / "A Special Message of Hope"
                 (' ') July 4th, 2001
                 (U) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


INTERNATIONAL BOOKBURNING IN PROGRESS

[July 4, 2001 - LUBBOCK, TX.] Free speech is under siege at the margins of
the
Internet. Quite a few countries are censoring access to the Web through DNS
[Domain
Name Service] filtering. This is a process whereby politically incorrect
information is
blocked by domain address -- the name that appears before the dot com
suffix. Others
employ filtering which denies politically or socially challenging subject
matter based on
its content.

Hacktivismo and the CULT OF THE DEAD COW have decided that enough is too
much.
We are hackers and free speech advocates, and we are developing technologies
to
challenge state-sponsored censorship of the Internet.

Most countries use intimidation and filtering of one, kind or another
including the
Peoples Republic of China, Cuba, and many Islamic countries. Most claim to
be blocking
pornographic content. But the real reason is to prevent challenging content
from
spreading through repressive regimes. This includes information ranging from
political
opinion, "foreign" news, women's issues, academic and scholarly works,
religious
information, information regarding ethnic groups in disfavor, news of human
rights
abuses, documents which present drugs in a positive light, and gay and
lesbian content,
among others.

The capriciousness of state-sanctioned censorship is wide-ranging. [1]

* In Zambia, the government has attempted to censor information revealing
their plans
for constitutional referendums.

* In Mauritania -- as in most countries --, owners of cybercafes are
required to supply
government intelligence agents with copies of e-mail sent or received at
their
establishments.

* Even less draconian governments, like Malaysia, have threatened
web-publishers for
violating their publishing licenses by publishing frequent updates: _timely,
relevant_
information is seen as a threat.

* South Korean's national security law forbids South Koreans from having any
contact
-- including contact over the Internet -- with their North Korean neighbors.

* Sri Lanka threatened news sites with possible revocation of their licenses
if coverage
of a presidential election campaign was not partial to the party of the
outgoing
president.

The risks of accessing or disseminating information are often great.

* In Ukraine, a decapitated body found near the village of Tarachtcha is
believed to be
that of Georgiy Gongadze, founder and editor of an on-line newspaper
critical of the
authorities.

* In August, 1998, eighteen year old Turk Emre Ersoz was found guilty of
"insulting the
national police" in an Internet forum after participating in a demonstration
that was
violently suppressed by the police. His ISP provided the authorities with
his address.

* Journalist Miroslav Filipovic has the dubious distinction of having been
the first
Journalist accused of spying because of articles published on the
Internet -- in this case
detailing the abuses of certain Yugoslav army units in Kosovo.

We are sickened by these egregious violations of information and human
rights. The
liberal democracies have talked a far better game than they've played on
access to
information. But hackers are not willing to watch the custodians of the
International
Convention on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights
turn them into a mockery. We are willing to put our money where our mouth
is.

Hacktivismo and the CULT OF THE DEAD COW are issuing the HACKTIVISMO
DECLARATION as a declaration of outrage and a statement of intent. It is our
Magna
Carta for information rights. People have a right to reasonable access of
otherwise
lawfully published information. If our leaders aren't prepared to defend the
Internet, we
are.

                 -----------------------------------------------------------
----------

[1] some information cited in this press release was either paraphrased, or
quoted
directly, from the "Enemies of the Internet" report published by Reporters
Without
Frontiers, and may be found at http://www.rsf.fr

/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>

THE HACKTIVISMO DECLARATION assertions of liberty in support of an
uncensored
internet

DEEPLY ALARMED that state-sponsored censorship of the Internet is rapidly
spreading
with the assistance of transnational corporations,

TAKING AS A BASIS the principles and purposes enshrined in Article 19 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) that states, _Everyone has the
right to
freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold
opinions without
interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through
any media
and regardless of frontiers_, and Article 19 of the International Covenant
on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR) that says,

1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall
include
freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds,
regardless of
frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or
through any other media of his choice.

3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article
carries with it
special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain
restrictions,
but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:

(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;

(b) For the protection of national security or of public order, or of public
health or
                 morals.

RECALLING that some member states of the United Nations have signed the
ICCPR, or
have ratified it in such a way as to prevent their citizens from using it in
courts of law,

CONSIDERING that, such member states continue to willfully suppress
wide-ranging
access to lawfully published information on the Internet, despite the clear
language of
the ICCPR that freedom of expression exists in all media,

TAKING NOTE that transnational corporations continue to sell information
technologies
to the world's most repressive regimes knowing full well that they will be
used to track
and control an already harried citizenry,

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT that the Internet is fast becoming a method of
repression
rather than an instrument of liberation,

BEARING IN MIND that in some countries it is a crime to demand the right to
access
lawfully published information, and of other basic human rights,

RECALLING that member states of the United Nations have failed to press the
world's
most egregious information rights violators to a higher standard,

MINDFUL that denying access to information could lead to spiritual,
intellectual, and
economic decline, the promotion of xenophobia and destabilization of
international
order,

CONCERNED that governments and transnationals are colluding to maintain the
status
quo,

DEEPLY ALARMED that world leaders have failed to address information rights
issues
directly and without equivocation,

RECOGNIZING the importance to fight against human rights abuses with respect
to
reasonable access to information on the Internet,

THEREFORE WE ARE CONVINCED that the international hacking community has a
moral
imperative to act, and we

DECLARE:

* THAT FULL RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS INCLUDES
THE LIBERTY OF FAIR AND REASONABLE ACCESS TO INFORMATION, WHETHER BY
SHORTWAVE RADIO, AIR MAIL, SIMPLE TELEPHONY, THE GLOBAL INTERNET, OR
OTHER MEDIA.

* THAT WE RECOGNIZE THE RIGHT OF GOVERNMENTS TO FORBID THE PUBLICATION
OF PROPERLY CATEGORIZED STATE SECRETS, CHILD PORNOGRAPHY, AND MATTERS
RELATED TO PERSONAL PRIVACY AND PRIVILEDGE, AMONG OTHER ACCEPTED
RESTRICTIONS. BUT WE OPPOSE THE USE OF STATE POWER TO CONTROL ACCESS
TO THE WORKS OF CRITICS, INTELLECTUALS, ARTISTS, OR RELIGIOUS FIGURES.

* THAT STATE SPONSORED CENSORSHIP OF THE INTERNET ERODES PEACEFUL AND
CIVILIZED COEXISTENCE, AFFECTS THE EXERCISE OF DEMOCRACY, AND
ENDANGERS THE SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONS.

* THAT STATE-SPONSORED CENSORSHIP OF THE INTERNET IS A SERIOUS FORM OF
ORGANIZED AND SYSTEMATIC VIOLENCE AGAINST CITIZENS, IS INTENDED TO
GENERATE CONFUSION AND XENOPHOPIA, AND IS A REPREHENSIBLE VIOLATION OF
TRUST.

* THAT WE WILL STUDY WAYS AND MEANS OF CIRCUMVENTING STATE SPONSORED
CENSORSHIP OF THE INTERNET AND WILL IMPLEMENT TECHNOLOGIES TO CHALLENGE
INFORMATION RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.

Issued July 4, 2001 by Hacktivismo and the CULT OF THE DEAD COW.

Relevant Web Links:

Universal Declaration of Human Rights
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_ccpr.htm

Reporters Without Frontiers
http://www.rsf.fr

CULT OF THE DEAD COW
http://www.cultdeadcow.com

==

Media Contact:
Oxblood Ruffin
Foreign Minister
CULT OF THE DEAD COW
oxblood@cultdeadcow.com
http://cultdeadcow.com

                 __//////\ -cDc- CULT OF THE DEAD COW -cDc- /\\\\\\__
                 Est. 1984 \\\\\\/ NINJA STRIKE FORCE * HACKTIVISMO \//////
Est. 1984
                 ####


_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold