rcam on Thu, 30 Aug 2001 03:51:37 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] (australia) some reports on the tampa |
The Age - overview http://www.theage.com.au/issues/stranded/ BBC - various reports http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/asia-pacific/newsid_1515000/1515882.s tm Proposed legislation to allow the use of force to interdict and turn around boats http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/2001/08/30/FFXF0QKQYQC.html Some comments... Australia is caught in an election cycle. Federal elections are due in a few months, and all political statements are hyped with this in mind. How else, in the complete absence of significant political differences, do parties assert 'the national interest' other than by competing as to who is better at guarding 'the nation' from 'invasions'? For some time, but in particular around a fortnight ago, the Opposition Australian Labor Party increased to fever pitch its rhetoric of Australia's borders being assailed by gun-runners, drug-runners and (you guessed it) people-smugglers. They have a longstanding policy of militarising the border under one authority: the so-called Coastguard. The ALP managed to seed the media with reports which apparently illustrated that Australia's borders were under threat by criminal gangs, including a five page spread in the _Australian_ newspaper. Seeing an opportunity to show that they were 'in control', a boat floundering just outside Australian waters became the Liberal-National Government's big election pitch. They instructed a foreign ship to rescue the boat and did so before it entered Australian waters. There has been no assessment as to whether or not a ship from Christmas Island might have made it there quicker, for instance. Nor has there been any assessment of how long the Australian Government knew that the boat was in distress before making a decision to send out a call for a rescue. A footnote... It is worth re-stating that the current Australian policy of mandatory and extrajudicial internment of undocumented migrants was authored by the Labor Party in 1992. Therefore, claims that the current frenzy over the most recent lot of arrivals amounts to a Liberal-National Coalition chasing One Nation votes are wrong. The Liberal-National Coalition has always competed with the Labor Party as to who was most xenophobic; the Labor Party began the cycle of running for elections by scapegoating undocumented migrants way back in 1992; and more to the point, all this began well before One Nation had even emerged on the political landscape, that being 1996. The Labor Party has simply reverted to its historical preoccupation with the White Australia Policy, which it championed from its inception, and brought into being in 1901. Angela _______________ <end message> _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list [email protected] http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold