brian carroll on Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:47:16 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] the World-Picture |
something has been gnawing at my senses, beyond foreboding, gloom, and chaos. but order and its systematic control. was going to wait to write this until after the US response to last week's attacks, and the subsequent falling-into-line of many a divergent but now easily convergent thread of things to come. to bear down upon, home and abroad. a call to war is one thing. a call to peace, another. but it is equally ineffective, that is, silence, as the quieter that public thought gets, the less there is, of the public mind. it seems that instead, a call to education is needed, moreso than the abstraction that is peace, as is war. as it is able to deal with the psychological import and impact and theoret- ically, may enable action through peaceful means, to continue on with public ideas, public missions, public goals, side- stepping direct confrontation, and back into the reasoning, the way things are and are not, work and do not, etcetera. too simple, yea. yet, more complex than the immediate, looking at the tv representatives and representations, whether they are from academia, from government, from industry, from the common person and their probable cause, it is is re-presented. maybe it is or has been or could be called the 'second order' versus the first, of events. or third or fourth. while the things that move forward, predictable, forge ahead with a force growing beyond anyone's control, even that of the government or industry. thus, for whatever fears one has to say in public, their thoughts, that might appear to be disruptive to these larger goals, it is still possible that while things are the way they are now, that as things do unravel, with some prediction, that education, questioning, not knowing, will come back into the scene in this tragic play. it is that funny thing, truth, logic, and language, that is repeating in the constellation of synapses, depth-charged by worst-case scenarios on 9/11/01. yet, the direct connection, say, between internet artists or electronic this or that, including computer manufactures, may not desire war, as their computers are powered by nuclear plants and turbines run by gas and oil. the imports of the great world game. the thought is this. given the givens, very simple, that are war on or already over the horizon, an unstable geopolitical arena, use of massive force for the accounting books of 'his- story', and the Middle East area involved, as everywhere there is a terrorist, never defined, what a terrorist is. it could be you and me, who knows, unless people begin asking outloud... one, every nation-state will be able to attack its opponents, to liquidize them, vaporize them, get rid of them, with what is or may be called 'the moral majority', whose morality but that of what exists today, the status quo, or moreso. ie, no change. second, any chaos into the complexity of the Middle East will in one way or the other effect the oil industry. over time. that is, at the other end of the production-consumption model, the electronic internetwork that is the Internet, Cyberspace, whatnot. it is probable that institutions will act as they have, and will act predictably, and thus have weak-points in the same old areas. for the West, as for the rest of the world, it is oil, its import from exporting nations, and the controlling of land, through some means, the production process. if this should get undone, out of control of the predictable tit-for-tat, but in worst-case scenarios, then it may be worth- while considering something like education again, to debate this real possibility when given already solid policies, whether they are political, economic, or social. of many things stated, democracy is not an import in most countries exporting oil. there are prices to pay to keep things stable, and simple. but from the standpoint of war, and a machinery based upon oil to fight a war, to keep a civilization's knobs and levers in working condition, requires this oil. in many countries, it has been stated, there are 'terrorists' that threaten these non- democratic countries, to keep things flowing as is. the other side of this is that of policy, regarding oil, energy. if one looks at the impact of mega-structures, such as the world trade centers that are now an archaeological project of deepest pain, agony, and also the large-scale power plants, which it has been stated elsewhere have 'hit me' signs on them in times of terror, the fewer the better, well- the current US energy policy is based on this vulnerable model. one, conflict over oil and coal production at home, to buffer against world fluctuations, while not feasibly having enough oil to feed all the machines, thus, import reliant, given a traditional model. second, there is a lot of newsbytes about security around giant power plants, for a failure at one could cast a darkness not of an hour or two, but weeks or longer, should something occur on such a grand-scale, as grand as the plants are themselves. add a nuclear plant and the same scenario witnessed on 9/11/01 and one gets an idea that the nuclear issues, out of sight and out of mind, are not irrelevant in their potential impacts given chaos. and, surprisingly or not, the base of SUV owners in California, during the great power criss of 2001, which is no longer it is said from above, voted, er, were polled, and overwhelmingly support nuclear solutions to fix all problems. the US energy policy, if it were used in conjunction with the response the US will bring to lands and minds of all in the coming days, could offer changing the field of engagement, proactively, by changing the strategy that is so predictable in its current policy. really, given military terms, as an idea, (an old, very predictable idea), it is strategically very bad, for the government, for the military, for the people, and for the world. there is no way to stop what is coming. at least that is what it seems to me. one could put their body down, on the ground, and the steamroller would go right on over, at this point. no change. taking oil and energy into account, this action, or lack of action, is the grande Achilles Heel, the weakest point. and the US may be cherry-picking terrorists in the Middle East, or whatever it will do, but will not change in its course, like an old ship liner, biggest and best, which chugs through the cold ocean waters, as the iceburg waits, in the fog of mind, ahead, a relatively short distance away. one wish, only one, at this time, as all else seems futile for this person, is that, whatever the US does do, which it will do and likely should do something, and which few if any know what should be done, militarily, economically, politically, diplomatically, etc. is this: energy policy is deeply connected to the first-order impacts, medium-term they will be revealed, should things go further into chaos, in the war on terror. at that point, the remote control TV viewer may one day no longer have their TV due to the current US energy policy, unless it is changed to address the changed world view, as its enemies know it, as the world knows it, its behavior. else, if indeed the US is the child, or teenager, who will do what they do until they find the world does not conform to their will alone, that there will be impacts, likely in the energy sector. and if this was proactively addressed, that is, changed, that many more lives and much more stability and even freedom for those at home and abroad could be enacted, in this ongoing tragedy that is living a life unlived. dreaming, always in nightmares. everything is in suspension outside, this morning. something hangs in the air, a psyche or psychosis in the waiting, or in the beginning, to form, to parse, to bring itself into the world. but, as insane as it is to say or believe right now: there is opportunity in this tragedy, to change while also addressing the other means of war. to change energy policy, educational approaches, many things, but to question, to begin to think outside of the status quo, predictable view. my naive hope is that, given the givens, given the bombs that will indeed fall somewhere at some time, given the people, the soldiers, the representatives, the people, and the adminstration, here in the US and abroad, that change, changing the way 'we' live, is not an absolute, as in biology, no change is no change, no evolution, if all the mutations are killed off, one is going to kill off the future, all other options for survival of the whole, under the guidence of a small and predictable part. please, if anyone has within their conscience something remotely related, please consider how addressing the end-results of any actions, necessary as they may be, will impact everyone, surely, through mundane but critically infrastructural issues such as power procurement, production, and its consumption, as if no- thing has changed in the way things are, or are reenacted. to hear a US energy policy which is bold, and about freedoms and opportunities, in unison with the issues of terrorism and war 'abroad', is not a choice. but it may not be perceived this way if things are as they are, as they have been, as all roads lead one to believe they will stay in their present course. this course could lead not just to the disasters of war, but also the disaster of civilized, electrified living. a warning only maybe, but given time, it seems logical this is at stake. action, but also change. change in policy, energy policy which would bring 'progress and peace' that the US administration like to reassure the people is a priority. i hope, at some level, in some way, this weakest of points, in the weakest of strategies, is reviewed, and transformed. to help not only the US, but the world, by helping human beings by changing the rules of the game. as the rules are already figured out, and the bad people do not follow the rules. if one wants to protest, they face being a bad person in mob rule, where people more nuts than have ever existed have cell-phones and can act with immunity, potentially. else, there is the inside of the academy, where certainty could be replaced with questions. and the dots unconnected, could be posed as connected, and debate and discussion and suggestions, and thought beyond the status quo might bring, someday, another 'expert' on TV that does not agree things are so simple, effect's so short-term, and to discuss it in terms that respects people's intelligence, if they are given the chance to think, freely, not be told secondhandly how things really are. this is not meant to be a post of confrontation, against the US government, a direct-engagement. but a plea, a suggestion, but a plea of hope, of change. else, it is all so predictable. there is an opportunity here, in the best of the entrepreneurial ethos, to make change happen, to take risks, and to evolve the things that could work better. if this could be considered, this different strategy, besides that of a predictable development of large-scale plants, oil-reliant economies, questionable relations with the countries the US relies upon in order to keep things as they are, when they will no longer be... i plead that someone, somewhere, also has this hope, sees an opportunity to change, for the better. just some thoughts, a dream in the nightmare as it unfolds. but an old dream. that of freedom, relative peace, and human rights, in relation to the long chain-of-command between the way things were prior to 9/11/01, and the way they are for- everafter now changed, for the worse. but possibly, with change, for the better. thus, a call to education... -- .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . .... .. .. ... . . . . . . . brian thomas carroll the_electromagnetic_internetwork electromagnetic researcher matter, energy, and in-formation [email protected] http://www.electronetwork.org/ _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list [email protected] http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold