josh zeidner on Sun, 4 Nov 2001 23:18:02 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> NetHierarchies & NetWar |
--- windseye <[email protected]> wrote: > Brian and Willard, > > Regarding the differences and similarities and the > interaction between > hierarchies and networks, or the incorporation of > one inside the other, it > is critically to examine some of the characteristic > defining differences > between the two types of organizations and to > examine the temporal > consequences of each. Hierarchies are premised on > control, power, > information, and decision making dispersed from high > to low. At the lowest > levels the scope, range, degree of power, control > and choice are extremely > limited. Capacity to respond, revise, modify either > overall tactics or > strategy is either extremely limited or > non-existent. Certainly shifting > the field of action and objectives is not possible. This touches on Deleuze. Network=Rhizome, Hierachy=arborescent/tree. A network is not necessarily a progression from a hierarchy, nor is one abstraction "better" or more condusive to "happiness" than the other. These two systems are necessary counterforms of the other. > > Networks on the other hand are premised on open > information, autonomy, > dispersal of power and responsibility, independent > analysis and decision > making, identification of problems to be solved > within the context of the > overall set of guidelines, and capacity to assist or > guide the network > into redefining its range, scope, needs, and goals. networks or informational dispersion is not always the optimum situation for idealized "freedom". > > Watch over time to not whether individual people > within a hierarchy or a > network become more "democratic" over time and > experience in one culture > (net or hierarchy) or another. The characteristics > of a network are more > congruent with democratic stance and functioning. > Which is more conducive > to developing functioning autonomous individuals who > act democratically? Which is more condusive to misinformation and propoganda? > > It may well be that anyone functioning long enough > in a network, > especially successfully, make take on the > characteristics and behaviors > most useful for the network approach to be > successful and they may become > "radicalized" in the process; they may never be able > to blindly > participate in a hierarchical organization, again. > This could be > simultaneously the real threat to existing > hierarchies, and the real > promise of networks. > > the promise of the internet never materialized, and it never will. Nettime is a hierarchy, and you are participating in it. -josh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list [email protected] http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold