McKenzie Wark on Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:55:02 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> The degree zero of nettime |
TT: An excellent paper, about which i have mixed feelings, because as i read it i seem to find among your original insights some of my own ideas and formulations, unacknowledged. Am i imagining this? The vectoral approach, as a way out of the divide between political economy and cultural studies, based on the materiality of the means of communication -- i put this out on nettime many times. Nettime/syndicate appear as objects to which you bring a theory, but they are already theoretical objects. It strikes me there's a difficulty here. As the corpus of the lists become the object of scholarship, which is i believe a good thing, there are questions that come up about protocol. I suspect i may not be the only one to have this reaction. Brian is quite right to point to the going-beyond of the division of labour between cultural studies and political economy. But it is precisely this going beyond to which nettime responds both as a theory and a practice. k ___________________________________________________ http://www.feelergauge.net/projects/hackermanifesto/version_2.0/ ... we no longer have roots, we have aerials ... ___________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list [email protected] http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold