McKenzie Wark on Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:55:02 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> The degree zero of nettime



TT:

An excellent paper, about which i have mixed feelings, because as
i read it i seem to find among your original insights some of my
own ideas and formulations, unacknowledged. Am i imagining
this? The vectoral approach, as a way out of the divide between
political economy and cultural studies, based on the materiality
of the means of communication -- i put this out on nettime many
times. Nettime/syndicate appear as objects to which you bring
a theory, but they are already theoretical objects. It strikes me there's
a difficulty here. As the corpus of the lists become the object of
scholarship, which is i believe a good thing, there are questions
that come up about protocol. I suspect i may not be the only one
to have this reaction.

Brian is quite right to point to the going-beyond of the division of
labour between cultural studies and political economy. But it is
precisely this going beyond to which nettime responds both as
a theory and a practice.

k

___________________________________________________

http://www.feelergauge.net/projects/hackermanifesto/version_2.0/
                   ... we no longer have roots, we have aerials ...
___________________________________________________


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
[email protected]
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold