Curt Hagenlocher on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 18:28:01 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Nettime-bold] RE: <nettime> biology and technology


From: Ana Viseu <[email protected]>, quoted from The Observer
http://www.observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0%2C6903%2C673103%2C00.html

> Use of hand-held technologies, such as mobile phones, GameBoys and 
> computers, has caused a physical mutation in the under-25s, 
> according to new research.

Ordinarily, the use of the word "mutation" in a context like this
implies a genetic change that will be passed on to offspring.
Clearly, that is not the case in this quote.  I suspect that the
intent was to create the impression that the species is moving
on -- evolving to meet the demands of the digital age -- when
really this is no different than the black lung developed by coal
miners -- purely a physiological response to an external stimulus.

(The quote comes from The Observer's writer and not from the
study itself.)

From: coco fusco <[email protected]>, quoted from a recent report
by Casa de la Mujer-Grupo Factor X 

> "In terms of academic research in Mexico, little attention 
> has been directed  to the long-term impact on labor conditions
> and the health of the workers. In spite of this, it has been
> possible to ascertain the following: work related injuries are
> directly related to the kind of work that is realized. For 
> example, in the electronics industry there are a number of 
> illnesses and conditions that are directly related to working
> with toxic substances."

In contrast, many of these toxic substances ARE mutagenic and
can change the DNA -- which is why there is such a relatively
high rate of spontaneous abortion, stillbirth and birth defects
among the women working in the maquiladoras.

--
Curt Hagenlocher
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
[email protected]
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold