CPVERSION SEVENTY on Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:21:11 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> barneys, etoy and the dot.com worker |
>alex galloway wrote: >why is Barneys [barneys.com] not art but Etoy is? >they both have a corporate aesthetic. no art responds: both are suspect... the first is obvious because its essential function is in the service of capital selling a elevated class station and supposed status to anyone who is caught offgaurd and/or sleeping. the second is a little more subdued. etoy seems to forsake any vital trangressive energies it might have most obviously by its eventual compliance into a certain "cult of personality"; not unlike barneys in selling a product of "lifestyle" that basically equates into a new liberal-left vogue or "simulated act of transgression". both barneys and etoy tell lies only one does this under the guise of establishment and the other under the guise of anti-establishment. neither offer new models nor suggest other systems of management outside this system. in fact both are clever methods of incorporation into the established system (accelerated capitalism). etoy is arguably more detrimental to artists because it offers a new space for further capitalist growth and acquisition under the premise of the "avant-garde". in certain ways etoy operates on the same level of the new dot.com scene: relaxed workspace, casual-hip attire, a high level of formal education, liberal politics... all elements of some new-mythos to further compliment, comfort and further seduce the worker and hyper-extend her energies of production far beyond the designated "work-space". twhid from mteww.com stated in a previous post something to the effect of, "art isn't cool or hip or always pleasing". it is interesting and appropriate statement from someone who is an artist supporting his work via a dot.com and coming to the eventual terms of its increasing madness upon the autonomous "act of the corporate" instead of the preferred scenario of vice-versa. this skirts a serious problem with the "artworld" (this online ghetto included). there are too many artists here that are too easy to get along with. it makes me happy to know "zero one dot org" and brad brace both lurk out there somewhere... -na ===== //////////////////////////////////////////// *PLEASE DO NOT GO TO YAHOO.COM *DON'T CLICK ON BANNERS EVER AGAIN *CAPITAL & EXCHANGE ARE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PSYCHE --INSTEAD GO TO: http://www.artnetweb.com/peppermint //////////////////////////////////////////// __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]