Rachel Schreiber on Tue, 18 Apr 2000 19:26:26 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Why We Are Taking Action Against the World Bank and IMF |
In what was an otherwise eloquent and concise account of the recent actions taken against the World Bank and IMF, I was troubled by the Gold rush narrative. To analogize the relationship between global capitalist superpowers and developing nations to a marriage between a European-American and a Native woman is problematic and arcane. Aren't we done with gendering so-called "third world" nations to women? The assignation continues to normalize heterosexuality as a relationship of economic domination and ideological control. And do we really believe that the West acts in the capacity of a "kind and thoughtful husband" towards developing countries, aiming to please by lovingly searching for pine nuts? The net result of this analogy is to strip agency away from both a Native woman married to a European-American, as well as from non-Western nations. Isn't this precisely what we're fighting? Rachel Schreiber > >shaking the branches to knock the cones down. During the Gold Rush, it >often happened that a European-American man would marry a Native woman. >When pine nut season came around, she might ask her husband to gather >some. Let�s say that he was a kind and thoughtful husband, who loved her >and wanted to please her, but that he was ignorant of the ways of her >people and no longer young, daring, nor patient enough to climb the trees >and shake the branches. Instead, he would simply cut down a pine tree. <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]