T.V. Weber & Alida Weber on Thu, 15 Jun 2000 05:06:04 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> World War III Diary: NATO Expansion is a Tripwire for War |
World War III Diary: NATO Expansion is a Tripwire for War One lesson that everyone should have learned from World War I, but nobody did, is that networks of alliances don't prevent wars. Instead, every local conflict becomes a tripwire that drags one hapless nation after another into an ever-expanding war. During the breakup of the former Soviet Union, Russia willingly dissolved the Warsaw Pact, with the understanding that the West would reciprocate by dissolving NATO. To reciprocate would have made good sense, from the standpoint of both practicality and morality. But the West did no such thing, instead seizing the opportunity to expand NATO into the vacuum left by the Warsaw Pact. Russia protested this breach of faith, correctly viewing it as an attempt to encircle and cripple Russia permanently, both militarily and economically. Until the last round of NATO expansion, which took effect about a week before the bombing of Yugoslavia, Russia's protests were mistakenly ignored by many in the West as just a form of paranoia. But NATO's attack on Yugoslavia, its occupation of Kosovo, and its flouting of U.N. Resolution 1244, have persuaded Russia that any further expansion of NATO is a very real threat to Russia's continued existence. What does that mean? Unless the West comes to its senses, Russia will do whatever is necessary to prevent NATO from approaching any closer to its borders, and that means war. You'd think Western leaders would use some common sense and back off. But now we see Croatia--a longtime and bitter enemy of both Yugoslavia and Russia--joining the misnamed "Partnership for Peace" and riding the fast track into NATO. This is described in the article, "Croatia in the Partnership for Peace," by Igor Alborghetti, which appeared in Globus National Weekly (Zagreb, Croatia 5/12/00). The new Croatian premier, Ivica Racan, made a speech in Brussels in which he expressed his wish to be an active partner of NATO. The article even quoted Racan as saying, "Units of the Croatian Army will be deployed in Kosovo as part of the composition of the NATO force there." (See http://www.egroups.com/message/decani/29363?&start=29362.) Another article, "Croatian police in Kosovo," appeared in Danas (Belgrade) 6/5/00. Croatian foreign minister Tonino Picula claims that Croatia will send a police unit, not a military unit, as its contribution to the KFOR/UNMIK occupation...as if that's going to be any consolation to the beleaguered Serbs holding out in Kosovo. (See http://www.egroups.com/message/decani/29905?&start=29881.) What does the West hope to gain from these crazy provocations? Simple--whenever another country gets ready to join NATO, it bankrupts itself to pay top dollar for U.S.-made armaments, so as to bring their forces up to NATO standards. Make no mistake; that money will never find its way into the pockets of U.S. voters and taxpayers. If anything, in the long run, U.S. voters and taxpayers will end up subsidizing many of these purchases. The profit goes to the merchants of death who wield political power behind the scenes in the U.S., and they owe loyalty to no one but themselves. But that's not all, not by a long shot. According to the Washington Post article, "Nine Nations United in Bid to Join NATO," by William Drozdiak (5/20/00), the foreign ministers of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Albania, and Macedonia, all got together to invite themselves into NATO. (See http://www.egroups.com/message/decani/29207?&start=29182.) This proposed "big bang" NATO expansion (what an evocative name!) would, of course, require legislative approval in Western nations, including the approval of the U.S. Senate. And, according to a Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty report (6/1/00), NATO Secretary-General George Robertson announced at NATO's Parliamentary Assembly in Budapest that NATO will not make a decision on whether or not to admit new members until 2002. (See http://www.centraleurope.com/hungarytoday/news.php3?id=164942.) So this "big bang" might not be a foregone conclusion--not officially, anyway. But 2002 is only a year and a half away, and Robertson is a NATO leader and one of that organization's main spinmeisters, so that's not much of an assurance. The real issue is this: Why are these nine foreign ministers so eager to drag their nations down into an even greater degree of financial ruin than they currently suffer, as well as into a great risk of widespread war? These people are selling themselves and their nations into slavery. But why? Is someone manipulating these foreign ministers behind the scenes, with bribery, threats, deception, or flattery? Or is it simple appeasement--after the bombing of Yugoslavia, any failure to show enough enthusiasm for joining the New World Order means that their country will be bombed next? Maybe joining NATO will, in fact, prevent NATO from bombing their country the next time the president of the U.S. feels the need to "wag the dog." But that won't keep their country from becoming a battleground in the next major war. We suggest that NATO is not the only entity that can bomb. Are we just blowing smoke--or is it mushroom clouds? The article, "Scaling NATO's Ramparts," by Helle Bering, (Washington Times "Opinion" 5/24/00, http://www.egroups.com/message/decani/29452) foolishly supported NATO expansion, even though the same article relayed Russian President Vladimir Putin's warning that "'the expansion of military alliances' outside Russia's borders is a threat to Russian security." And Russia regards NATO-led combined military exercises in the Baltic Sea, which involve both NATO and non-NATO nations, as a direct threat (see "NATO-led military exercises begin in Baltic Sea" (Reuters, 6/6/00 http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/reuters20000606_690.html). Clearly, joining NATO is no shortcut to national security and no guarantee of peace and safety. A nation--any nation--is better served by keeping its own armed forces on its own territory, ready to defend its own borders, shores, and skies--and by avoiding any words or actions that would give unnecessary and pointless offense to other nations. T.V. Weber & Alida Weber P.O. Box 388164 Chicago, IL 60638-8164 U.S.A. 1-773-767-5690 # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]