David Mandl on 25 Oct 2000 15:13:43 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Do Dot-Coms Have More Shady Characters? |
The Standard October 24, 2000, 2:31 PM PDT Do Dot-Coms Have More Shady Characters? Managers at Net companies are 4 times as likely to have tarnished backgrounds than offline counterparts, a security firm says. By Dan Goodin Managers at Internet companies are four times as likely to have shady backgrounds than their counterparts in the economy as a whole, according to an unscientific survey released by a firm that provides investigative services to corporations. The findings by Kroll Associates come five months after the founder of Pixelon, who raised $30 million for the media-streaming startup, was revealed as a convicted embezzler on the run from authorities. While the Pixelon saga was more dramatic than most dot-com frauds, the study suggests that it was far from unique. Of the 70 background checks Kroll conducted on Internet companies, 27, or 39 percent, uncovered an executive, director or consultant with ties to organized crime, securities violations, undisclosed bankruptcies or histories of fraud. Kroll says its investigations usually turn up "unsavory backgrounds" only 10 percent of the time. "There seemed to be more problem-people coming up in the dot-com area, mainly due to the headlong rush to get things done and move things along," says Ernest Brod, executive managing director at Kroll. In their haste, he said, dot-coms fail to establish routine steps for filtering out fraudulent managers. "When you don't have a historical approach of checking people out, and you don't have the type of people who are going to ask questions, then those steps get skipped and that happens at your peril," he says. Despite the flood of young talent in the Internet pool, many managers with checkered pasts appeared to be older "vampire investors" with a long history of fraud and appeared to be taking advantage of the spending frenzy gripping the Internet sector. "In many of these circumstances, it would not have required a significant amount of digging to get to the information that we're talking about," he says. In one case, an Internet company that had recently received an unsolicited investment offer asked Kroll to look into the potential business associate. While Kroll was conducting the investigation, a local newspaper reported the individual to have been murdered; a history of penny-stock fraud and ties to organized crime also were reported. Although few dispute that background checks are more lax among Internet companies, news stories about the online world fail to reflect the findings of the Kroll study. Brod acknowledges that the survey did not study a wide enough group to be scientifically valid, but he says it nonetheless helps to quantify what he and many others have been hearing anecdotally for some time. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]