brian carroll on 10 Nov 2000 17:34:55 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Re: Energy, Elections, and the Internet (ii) |
Bush the 2nd, General Swartzkopf, Gen. Colin Powell, Former CIA Director and President Bush the First, and Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense, at the Helm. i wonder how all these old Cold Warriors, whom thrive on authoritarian and totalitarian, non-democratic structures of militarism, are going to do at protecting human rights and freedoms of speech and liberty and conscience, when it is not in their institutional nature to do so. a General, as a General, does not function in a democratic realm, but in a hierarchical, top-down structure of total control. add some idealism/dogma, and a thousand messiahs to the cause, and the 'New Republican Era', as they've announced it, has been birthed. not by the 3% Nader voters, not by the 48% Gore voters. but by the 49% of Bush voters whom identify with the simplistic view of media personification as 'President as friend and good neighbor' that the mass media has amplified so well. that is, the personality as larger-than- life, the newest electronic icon in the pantheon of the mythic nation-state. the Democrats, at least on tv, are turning on the Naderites as their reason for losing. not their own rightward drift and playing the center and ignoring progressive politics. it was inevitable, the shift, as the trade-off had a price that will now be paid. the illusion is now over. reality will set in, that the Conservatives are in control, and have been, the whole time. it started with the 3rd party of Ross Perot, with his charts and graphs showing the US federal deficit. Clinton took it up as his cause, and the Clinton economy took off. Nader, not having the money to do the infomercials that Perot did to promote his cause, did not get into the debate by getting into the media. instead, he and his challenging ideas were and continue to be ignored, and are deemed utopic. the media protected Bush. they played it Conservative. it is hard to imagine that their uncritical analyses will ever cut into who Bush really is as a public citizen. insider trading violations with the Security and Exchange Commission. the Driving under the Influence 20+ years ago got some attention, who really cares, but the cocaine use attributed to Bush the 2nd never got air time. ironic, if Bush the First waged a war after Noriega while his son, George the 2nd, potentially the first King of the US, was snorting it in the Presidental bathroom. no problem with it, really, besides the fact that the candidate in question is running on the platform of bringing 'truth and dignity to the White House.' it is not hypocrisy, it is levels beyond that- it is a downright coup d'etat. wonder why there is no mention of Bush the 2nd going AWOL during his National Guard duty during Vietnam, and receiving no 'consequence', like he proposes everyone who does not 'obey the law' is due. Prison builders, of the mind, and death penalty users, against any remote idea of any 'immoral' crime. "They are going to get the Ultimate Consequence: The Death Penalty." he said of three (actually 2) Texas Death Row inmates during the second presidential debate. not once, not twice, but three times Bush the 2nd declared this with glee- without any substantial critique by the media. General Swartzkopf, campaigning in the closing days with Bush in Florida, was given airtime to call Vice President Gore 'a liar', which was then broadcast across the country via radio, tv, and by the newspapers. this is a general of the US Military, calling the VP a liar. untruthful. e.g., deceitful. to me this is scary as hell when Generals join the political punditry of the media image. their call-to-arms is not to get out the vote, it is to wage war. apparently the US military is preparing itself for a long stay in the White House Oval Office and such, as Bush I, Bush II, Cheney, Swartzkopf, Powell, and probably Dole and McCain will join the ranks of the military elite, intelligence community, command and control, and the legendary 'American Heroes' in guiding the country ('and the World') into the 21st century. the 'democratic' mass media (misnomer, that is), having been conservative in their reporting, now will have dug their own grave. for example, a scenario of authoritarian boardroom influence on free expression in the press (and, Internet): A local TV reporter attempts to do an expose' on George the 2nd's shady background on insider trading and sweetheart deals with Texas oil and energy companies. it is about to be broadcast, when a rumor hits the boardroom of the pending broadcast. the local station, say NBC, is owned by a parent company, say General Electric, whom is tied into the highly monopolistic energy production and supply industry, which in turn ties back into billion dollar market relationships with energy companies such as Enron which financed Bush's political career, and whose special interests he protects and tries to enhance 'for the Good of America.' it seems a critique of government by `free' media, which is itself owned by the private people whom may put the Bush government in place, ironically, happens to be run by authoritarian leaders from the military and intelligence communities. will democratic free speech prevail? or will a hyper- surreal self-censorship and purging of dissent occur for all those whom do not follow the party line... from the mass media whom have to obey, to further restrictions and monitoring of dissenting free speech online the inter- network? like the game scoreboards that reporters were using to chart the election exit polls like a football game, will the false-reality of choice and freedom disappear to a simplistic authority of pseudo-choice, that being the 'right' or wrong choice, whereby the opposition grows and the militarists are in office, as media celebrities, like Stormin' Norman, whom had his own television special 2 weeks before the election on his Gulf War victory. the subtle, now literalized. don't be scared- be prepared. that's what i'm telling myself over and over. and yet it is awfully isolationist in America tonight. people hoped for what they thought was `the best' and got the worst. makes me really wonder if mass democracy and representation work well at all, given the ambiguity of the public-private enigma that looms larger than ever before over the American psyche. it is about organizing, i hear. yet, nobody seems to care much about commonality from a philosophical or a mundane perspective. yet, it is so very fundamental to the future of geopolitics and the Internet. to nuclear war and global warming. to being able to feed oneself and drink clean water. time to get back to the basics. enough new words. enough endless texts about variants on a theme. time for a common language, a structure from which to organize a larger movement for change. some say "it's not time yet." let's make it the time. shared energy + shared work = shared power human being bc the architecture of electricity http://www.architexturez.com/ae/ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]