nettime's_anonymizing_service on 9 Feb 2001 05:08:49 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Re: Strategic Spam |
The thing that will get rid of Spam quicker than anything is its use as a free speech medium for public dissent. The Good Spam may thus destroy the Spammers Network, as governments will be threatened by their loss of control over pseudo-public discourse. The threat is that everyone will Spam. And they probably will after a new tactic for free speech/thought is enacted. It could be a horrible price to pay for getting an idea out infront of the masses. But it would be a Public Policy Idea. not political, per se, not economic, per se, not partisan, per se. It would be about Human Beings at the most general level. The attacks against the Public Policy Spam could be most helpful in getting the word out, in that reactions would be confused and would put open-communications in a whole new perspective. There is an opportunity because it will only get harder to do. And there is a chance to utilize the current network for voicing Public Ideas, as they can get no greater exposure in the current system. This is not about revolution. Or about creating a group or movement around a group's ideas. It is about things we all face as human beings, and making these part of the national and international discourse. So, instead of 2nd grade reading levels for children being the main campaign topic for the US Presidential Debates, War, Energy, Pollution, Poverty, Inequality, would be what the larger issues are to be addressed. It is about control. It is worth taking the heat, taking the hate-mail, for this effort to change the discourse, from privately- controlled exchanges to publicly defined goals and objectives. This is a chance unlike any other. Profane, yes. Dangerous in its consequences, for both an avalanche-effect and for the Spammers. But it could also have a Positive Impact. And not everything is about individuals, and individuals' ideas. Some things we share in common. Not universalization by differentiation, but by our common bonds. -anon. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]