Josephine Bosma on 10 Feb 2001 16:30:31 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Re: [Nettime-bold] Josephine Berry's net art history |
Even if I have respect for the amount of work Josephine Berry has put in her thesis, I feel like I have to make a comment about what I see as a few basic mistakes in her analyses. The basis of Berry's way of thinking seems to be that net art started in 1996 with net.art. There is no or hardly any mentioning of network art before that time, and even of net art made by others during the time net.art started to be discussed. Then there is the insistent hammering on the alledged political aims of this first net.art 'group'. Even if the works and attitude of -some- members of this group have been very influential in the way net art has been approached in especially the nettime community ( and also in the way it inspired some artists of a younger generation) it would be wrong to make an analyses of net art depend on these few and the spin around them. What I read (and have read in the past) from Josephine Berry view on net art is a strong focus on this political aspect of early net.art which then turns into an analyses of its failure every time she writes about it. And of course, what else could it be. The revolutionary potential of 'political' art (for lack of a better term) has always been very small. This art is always part of a larger cultural change or tendency. I hope it is clear in her thesis that this particular analyses concerns a small but influential part of net art and that there will be many more up to date chapters on other artworks and trends in her thesis. best J * # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]