Ronda Hauben on 11 Feb 2001 23:45:05 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> The origins of the Internet - mailing list discussion |
There's been an important discussion on the community memory mailing list about the origins of the ARPANET and Internet, which started with a post by Les Earnest critiquing the history channel (cable tv in the US) account of how the Net was started by desire to hook together the terminals to three different time sharing system supported by ARPA's IPTO. I thought this discusion would be of interest to those on Nettime - and so am sending to nettime this post I recently sent to the community memory mailing list about the narrowness of the discussion thus far. >From [email protected] Sat Feb 10 19:11:20 2001 >Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 19:11:20 -0500 (EST) >From: <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [CM>] Origins of the ARPANET vint cerf <[email protected]> wrote: >I think it is fair to say that the History Channel program used Bob Taylor's >remarks (repeated in Katie Hafner's book) in an oversimplified way. I think >Bob actually felt motivated by the belief that the systems he used required >three distinct terminals (for whatever reason) and that it should have been >possible to reach all three timeshared machines with one. Rightly or wrongly >this led to the notion of networking things. >Plainly the outcome solved a lot more than that "problem" Yes and such oversimplification leads to myths that impede the public understanding of the origins of the ARPANET and then the Internet. And hence can also be harmful in the dissemination of the needed public knowledge to support the continue the development of the Internet. That is why it is good Les made an effort to challenge such oversimplifications. With regard to the origins of the ARPANET, JCR Licklider explains (I think it was in his interview with the Babbage Institute) that he had a vision for the need for an Intergalactic computer network, but that it was too early to start it when he started at ARPA and started the Information Processing Techniques Office in 1962. However several people including Larry Roberts say that Lick's vision of the importance of doing networking was an inspiration to them. And Ivan Sutherland in his interview with the Babbage Institute describes how he tried to start a networking program at UCLA during his turn at IPTO, but that that didn't then succeed. Also I think Steve Crocker in his interview with the Babbage Institute mentions having known of or having been part of this earlier effort to start a networking program by ARPA/IPTO. Also ,in his Babbage Institute interview, Ivan Sutherland suggests that it was important to have researchers who would take on the problems of a networking research program, and he suggests that that was one of the important contributions that made the ARPANET research program a success as opposed to the problem that hadn't been taken on by the earlier UCLA program. This helps to suggest that it wasn't only a question of those who would fund a networking research program, but that identifying and welcoming the contributions of capable researchers was an important task for ARPA/IPTO to have taken on which contributed to the success of the ARPANET and then the Internet research programs at ARPA. It is good that Bob Taylor and Charles Herzfeld decided to fund a networking program. But it is important that why the ARPANET program was able to be started, not be looked at in that narrow perspective. Also it is important that the ARPANET not be confused with the Internet, as it so often is in the portrayal in books and tv etc. The ARPANET program pioneered packetswitching and many other important developments, it was one big network under the control of one entity. The Internet, via the creation of tcp/ip was able to change the paradigm, by making it possible for diverse networks, under different administrations and with different local characteristics to communicate. The Internet made it possible to create a metanetwork of networks, and hence to have an Internet. This is an important development that needs to be understood in its contribution. While connecting different terminals was crucial for the development of the ARPANET (for example this was as I understand it a special challenge that was taken on at the 1972 ARPANET demonstration at the ICCC'72 in Washington), it was not yet taking on the problem that had to be solved to create an Internet. That problem had to do with making it possible for different networks to communicate. France for example by the 1972-1973 period was creating Cyclades under Louis Pouzin and England the NPL under Donald Davies and others. It would not be possible to expect these countries to subordinate their networks to the ARPANET, and to ask them to become a part of the ARPANET. By 1973 the need was recognized for the creation of an means of making possible communication across the boundaries of dissimilar networks. The problem was taken on in the paper describing TCP/IP (then called TCP) which was presented at an international network working group meeting in September 1973 in Great Britain and published by Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn in May 1974 in the IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol Com-22, N. 5, May 1974, pg 637. It seems important to recognize the fact that it is the creation of the TCP/IP protocol and the ability to have dissimilar networks communicate that it makes possible that is at the essence of what has made the Internet possible. I have been working on some draft papers about these developments and welcome comments on them. They are online at http://www.columbia.edu/~rh120/other/ Two particularly relevant papers to this discussion include part IV http://www.columbia.edu/~rh120/other/computer-communications.txt part V http://www.columbia.,edu/~rh120/other/birth_internet.txt Ronda [email protected] http://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/netbook/ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]