| Carl Guderian on 27 Mar 2001 15:14:34 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: <nettime> slashdot chooses its battle and complies to scientology claims |
I think the *real* test would be what Slashdot did if the clams were to demand the identity of the poster. If the poster's anonymizer wasn't up to snuff, then Xenu help him/her. And if Slashdot delivered up the poster, then all Xenu's legions of body thetans couldn't save Slashdot's reputation. Carl --- Drazen Pantic <[email protected]> wrote: > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/16/1256226&mode=thread > > < > Last Saturday a comment was posted here by an > anonymous reader that > contained text that was copyrighted by the Church of > Scientology. They > have since followed the DMCA and demanded that we > remove the comment. > While Slashdot is an open forum and we encourage > free discussion and > sharing of ideas, our lawyers have advised us that, > considering all > the details of this case, the comment should come > down. Read on to > understand what this means. > ... <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]