Steve Cisler on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:04:29 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Where's Mumford and Ellul |
Another name mentioned in Sean Cubit's posting: Jacques Ellul I've been interested in a group whose work is not destined for electronic fora and archives: The Jacques Ellul Society, which is a spinoff of the deep ecology philosophy. It's main supporters are rather technophobic and usually show up at the non-violent globophobe events: Jerry Mander, Andrew Kimbrell, Stephanie Mills, Kirkpatrick Sale. Then there is the very thoughtful Langdon Winner who has tenure at an engineering institute in New York. Here is what little I found online about the JES: www.deepecology.org/jacques.html JACQUES ELLUL SOCIETY In the early 1990s, FDE hosted a number of strategic meetings with international technology critics to discuss the roles that unbridled industrial megatechnologies are playing in the destruction of ecosystems, species and communities. These spirited "neo-Luddite" gatherings took place at FDE's San Francisco headquarters as well as at Schumacher College in Devon, England. They enlisted dozens of prominent activists to engage in systemic critiques of megatechnologies and technocracies in the tradition of Gandhi, Mumford, Schumacher, Illich, and others. By September 1995, a new organization had formed as a separate project within the International Center for Technology Assessment (ICTA) in Washington, D.C. Following significant discussions, the idea emerged to name the group the Jacques Ellul Society (JES), after the distinguished twentieth century French philosopher, who argued that only by analyzing the technological systems dominating culture and nature could modern society be understood. Up to that time, the creation of a coordinated, technology-critiquing movement faced enormous challenges, given the public's quasi-religious belief in technology as well as policy makers' increasing reliance on new technologies to address escalating social and environmental problems. Most critics and activists had been working in relative isolation, their views dismissed as Luddite or reactionary. With the f ormation of the Jacques Ellul Society under the direction of writer-activist-attorney Andrew Kimbrell (author of The Human Body Shop), like-minded thinkers finally found a forum and a more powerful, concerted voice. Through yearly meetings, members could share experiences and research, identify and respond to urgent controversies, and create a body of white papers documenting collective opinions on a variety of issues, from computers in education to genetic engineering to mountaintop removal mining. By the winter of 1998, JES launched the first issue of their journal, Techne, named after the Greek word that is the root of the word "technology" and means "the arts and crafts of man." The aim of the journal was to create an "alternative future vision" and to produce analyses of technologies that are far too often perceived as neutral, necessary for progress and without negative consequences. Stephanie Mills, Jerry Mander, Langdon Winner, Kirkpatrick Sale, Fritjof Capra, and others contributed articles and essays to that first issue. It was widely distributed among members of the media, academia, and activist communities. In the future, editorial responsibilities will be shared by Andrew Kimbrell and Charlene Spretnak (author of The Resurgence of the Real). With budgets for technology soaring in schools at the expense of arts, music, sports and nature classes, JES's Computers in Education Project has become the organization's top-priority campaign. Techne's second issue will be focused solely on the topic. A white paper on computer use in elementary schools is currently being written. A national press campaign is planned around its release, as well as legal action to challenge the federal government's computerizing of the education system. Other future JES projects include a public teach-in (in collaboration with the International Forum on Globalization) and the compilation of two annotated bibliographies to serve as essential resource guides for activists and researchers examining the role of technology in organizing social life in the modern world. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]