<nettime> Censorship in its most pernicious goofy form

Nmherman on Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:48:23 +0200 (CEST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

<nettime> Censorship in its most pernicious goofy form

To: [email protected]
Subject: <nettime> Censorship in its most pernicious goofy form
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:01:17 EDT
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Subj:    [Fwd: FLUXLIST: The St. Auby Tamas' tests and proposal to which Eric 
 Andersonreferred?]
Date:   7/10/2001 11:51:01 AM Central Daylight Time
From:   [email protected] (Eryk Salvaggio)
Reply-to:   <A HREF="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</A>
To: [email protected]


This is interesting.

Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: one38-one38:[email protected]
X-Envelope-To: [email protected]
Received: (qmail 43478 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2001 15:14:17 -0000
Received: from scribble.com ([email protected])
  by erraj.pair.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2001 15:14:17 -0000
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
    by scribble.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA20141
    for FLUXLIST-outgoing; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:11:42 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: scribble.com: majordom set sender to 
[email protected] using -f
Received: from mail14a.sanjose14-verio.com (mail14a.sanjose14-verio.com 
[128.121.193.6])
    by scribble.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA20138
    for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:11:41 -0700
Received: from www.fluxus.org (128.121.195.83)
    by mail14a.sanjose14-verio.com (RS ver 1.0.60s) with SMTP id 06203588
    for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:08:07 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:06:06 -0700
To: [email protected]
From: allen bukoff <[email protected]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: The St. Auby Tamas' tests and proposal to which Eric 
Anderson
  referred?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Loop-Detect: 1
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-URL: http://www.fluxus.org/FLUXLIST
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000



Fluxlisters,

I have attempted to reconstruct the entire thread of emails that St. Auby 
Tamas submitted to Fluxlist to which I believe Eric Anderson refers (and is 
copied below at the end of the string of Tamas emails).

An inquiry from Tamas about "who is the moderator of Fluxlist" led to an 
off-list reply from Sol Nte (reported on by Tamas in the second email 
below).  In his reply, Nte informed Tamas that any email message submitted 
to FLUXLIST that contains the words " G e n i u s  2 0 0 0" gets 
automatically blocked by our list-serv software.  Tamas then inquires "Who 
did ban it?" and "Why the Fluxlisters are not useing
the tiptop tool of the net for Direct Democratic voting?"  I believes this 
second question is what Anderson is calling a proposal.

In a series of 6 emails Tamas then tests the software by successfully 
submitting variations of the blocked phrase.  [If this email message gets 
through then I want " G e n i u s  2 0 0 0 " to be credited as test #7.]

Finally, Anderson responds saying "Great tests and proposal for maillist."

Then Owen Smith responded by saying he "seemed to have missed the original 
reference - what was the proposal??"

Some confusion has ensued.

Allen B




>Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:23:26 +0200
>From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Subject: FLUXLIST: moderator
>
>
>High!
>
>IPUT would like to know
>who is the moderator of the Fluxlist.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Hugh!
>
>aa




>Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:44:14 +0200
>From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Subject: FLUXLIST: tests
>
>
>High, dear Fluxlisters!
>
>After sending by IPUT
>The Never Arriving Emil to the
>private emil-address of 69 FLuxlisters,
>on Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Sol Nte wrote
>to IPUT's private emil-address:
>
> > (...)
> > The only moderation done on a daily basis
> > is by the majordomo software.
> > The post I got from you mentioned "xxxxxx xxxx",
> > if you sent that to the list
> > it won't have got through because
> > if you remember we had to stop Max
> > spamming the list with way too much
> > "xxxxxx xxxx" stuff back in 1999.
> > (...)
>
>The "xxxxxx xxxx" = banned text on the Fluxlist.
>
>Who did ban it?
>
>Why the Fluxlisters are not useing
>the tiptop tool of the net
>for Direct Democratic voting?
>
>Hugh!
>
>aa



Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:44:34 +0200
From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 1
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

High!

Genius

Hugh!

aa




To: <[email protected]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 2

High!

2000

Hugh!

aa




To: <[email protected]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 3

High!

enius 2000

Hugh!

aa




To: <[email protected]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 4

High!

Genius 000

Hugh!

aa



To: <[email protected]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 5


High!

Penius 2000

Hugh!

aa



To: <[email protected]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 6


High!

Genius 2001

Hugh!

aa






>Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 20:46:46 +0200
>From: Eric Andersen <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: tests
>
>
>Dear Tamas,
>
>Great tests and proposal for maillist. Finally some spirit on the list.
>It is interesting to see how silent everybody becomes, when your voice
>is heard.
>
>You seem to scare the mice.
>
>All the bests,
>Eric




>Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 09:46:29 -0400
>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: tests
>To: [email protected], [email protected]
>From: "Owen Smith" <[email protected]>
>
>[email protected] writes:
> >Dear Tamas,
> >
> >Great tests and proposal for maillist. Finally some spirit on the list.
> >It is interesting to see how silent everybody becomes, when your voice
> >is heard.
> >
> >You seem to scare the mice.
> >
> >All the bests,
> >Eric
> >
>
>Eric and/or Tamas - Somehow I seemed to have missed the original reference
>- what was the proposal??
>
>Owen




----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from  rly-yb03.mx.aol.com (rly-yb03.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.3]) by 
air-yb04.mail.aol.com (v78_r3.8) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:51:01 -0400
Received: from  relay1.pair.com (relay1.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by 
rly-yb03.mx.aol.com (v79.20) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYB35-0710125038; Tue, 
10 Jul 2001 12:50:38 -0400
Received: (qmail 27432 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2001 16:49:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO one38.org) (24.147.124.83)
  by relay1.pair.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2001 16:49:46 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 24.147.124.83
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:51:33 -0700
From: Eryk Salvaggio <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Organization: http://www.one38.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Fwd: FLUXLIST: The St. Auby Tamas' tests and proposal to which Eric 
 Andersonreferred?]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------D20094345A338DEE06898344"

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]

Prev by Date: <nettime> Have We Not Learned Anything From the 90s? OR, "abort, retry, fail; the end of the cyber ethic"
Next by Date: Re: <nettime> assay
Prev by thread: <nettime> Have We Not Learned Anything From the 90s? OR, "abort, retry, fail; the end of the cyber ethic"
Next by thread: <nettime> those who forget history are...ummm... [bello, pichlmair, shrdlu]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread