Rick Prelinger on Wed, 6 Mar 2002 02:14:46 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> FW: Digital Domesday Book lasts 15 years not 1000 |
This story as previously seen in nettime may be oversimplistic and alarmist. Plus, it shortsells the heroic role hackers might well play in making it possible to preserve legacy-formatted digital data. Here's a crosspost from the moving image archivists' listserv. Rick Prelinger Prelinger Archives - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sender: Association of Moving Image Archivists <[email protected]> From: Leo Enticknap <[email protected]> Subject: Reply: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs. film To: [email protected] Roger Smither writes: >Readers who have been following this strand may be interested in a story >of hardware obsolescence carried in the British newspaper 'The Observer' >last Sunday (3 March 2002). The headline was "Digital Domesday Book lasts >15 years not 1000" - the full text can be found on >http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4366728,00.html This story is full of errors, inaccuracies and exaggerations. For those who aren't familiar with the hardware and software specifics of the BBC Domesday Project, it was delivered on 2 double-sided 12" laserdiscs. Sides 1-3 were CLV and carried text, images and sound recordings (I seem to remember that one selling point of the project was that it included a photo of every town in the UK), whilst side 4 was a conventional, CAV PAL video containing some BBC national TV news reports. You could even play side 4 on a conventional, unmodified video laserdisc player. Hardware wise, it could be made to run on x86 PCs fitted with special graphics cards and a laserdisc drive controller interface. I was a high school pupil aged 14 in 1987 and distinctly remember it running on an MS-DOS platform. The claim that it only worked on specially modified BBC Micros is just plain wrong. True, the more common version consisted of a computer specifically designed for schools, the 'BBC Micro', which was built by Acorn computers. A quick web search will reveal large numbers of BBC Micro fanatics still out there and I'm sure the hardware and software needed to run the laserdisc drives and Domesday discs could be obtained after a little bit of sniffing. I suspect the real problem was that the data sides of these discs stored information in a weird mix of analogue and digital formats. They didn't follow the standard CLV pattern for video laserdiscs. I seem to remember that while the text was stored as digital data, sound recordings were encoded as analogue waveforms and I can't remember (if I ever knew) how the control hardware and software differentiated between the two. But this project is, as the report points out, only 15 years old, and I can't believe that the technicians and engineers who developed the disc format and created the masters did not keep records of the data storage and retrieval processes they used, and I find it difficult to believe that the glass masters for the discs were not preserved (the article states that the computer scientist trying to preserve the data only had two scratched sets of release discs to work with). Whilst I, like everybody on this list, appreciate the potential (and actual) problems of data storage obsolescence, this particular article seems to me to be grossly exaggerated and, as I say, there are also inaccuracies. Many thanks for the link, though. Leo -- Rick Prelinger Prelinger Archives http://www.prelinger.com P.O. Box 590622, San Francisco, Calif. 94159-0622 +1 415 750-0445 Fax: +1 415 750-0607 [email protected] Internet Moving Images Archive: http://www.moviearchive.org # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]