Ivo Skoric on Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:12:49 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Patriot Games, Croatia |
In the shadows of extraordinary performace of Croatian female skier Janica Kostelic at the Salt Lake City Olympics, the political situation in her homeland looks the least stable since the declaration of independence. While Croatian media and Croatians around the world would like to see Janica's success somehow as an expression of their capacity as a nation, as a metaphor for their collective aims, as a projection of their investment in democracy and free markets, the reality is dramatically different: Janica is a gifted kid, she is trained by one of the most persistent, headstrong coaches in the known universe and she trains mostly on Austrian slopes, using Austrian made gear. There is no involvement of the state or people of Croatia in her success - besides the fact that she and her family are Croatian. Meanwhile, with media being busy exhorting Janica, the losing party in the Croatia's winning political coalition, Drazen Budisa of HSLS, is doing everything to undermine the government and provoke early elections, that would, he hopes, propell him into presidency, at any cost. Not that present government is of any good, either. Croatian business leaders are touring the world - the US in particular: Ivo Covic, president of HEP, the national electric company, that just bailed out of its tragic deal with Enron; Tomislav Dragicevic, president of INA, the national oil company; Vesna Trnokop-Tanta, president of JANAF, the national oil pipeline company; Maja Brinar, Deputy Minister of Economy - they were all together in Washington DC on February 13, briefing the US Trade and Development Agency and the US Department of Commerce: looking for prospective foreign buyers for the last big chunks of Croatian economy. It is all about short term gains. Some of that to fill out the coffers of the executives, to assure the future for their offspring in the inevitably bad days expected to be visiting Croatia soon, more of that to obtain quick revenue to cover the foreign debt obligations ($12B) that Croatia accumulated in the past decade with disastrously curious speed. Already, 85% of Croatia's banking sector is sold to foreign capital and there are even talks of Croatia selling its stakes in the Krsko nuclear power plant to Slovenia. In the long term, however, that guarantees that main Croatia's assets are going to be its sports superstars like Goran Ivanisevic and Janica Kostelic - of course, that until Croatia decides to sell them to let's say Exxon or GE. Enters Budisa, the sore loser. He lost his bid to presidency in the last elections, but his political party (social-liberals) remained a coalition party in the government. In fact Tudjman's HDZ is still the strongest party in Croatia - it is the coalition of SDP and HSLS that won the elections, i.e. SDP's position would be untenable should HSLS decide to leave the coalition. And that's precisely what Budisa aims to obtain, by making 5 government ministers, all members of his party, resign their posts in the past month. Crippled Racan's government is pushed to the brink of early elections, Budisa hopes. But, what does he hope to gain? His party, HSLS, recently just barely won over 5% vote in the city of Zagreb (which is their largest support base). He can destroy Racan's government, but he cannot win the elections himself. HDZ, on the other hand, can win the elections. And there are rumors that Budisa intends to form the "historic coalition" of HSLS-HDZ, just as he did in year 2000 in Split with Ivica Racan between HSLS and SPD. Racan subsequently sidelined Budisa and pushed him in the presidential race with Mesic, that Budisa didn't have a chance to win. The first "historic coalition" ended badly for Budisa - he did not get any government position, yet he was not really an opposition either. Budisa, a former student protest leader and a lifelong librarian, is a political diletante, and the second "historic coalition" may end up as bad for him as the first one did, if not worse. That's particularly because this time he aims to make a pact with Ivic-Pasalic, the controversial HDZ politician who was the main proponent of Tudjman's botched colonial excursion in Bosnia. There is no question about who would be the boss in such coalition. But Budisa hopes Pasalic may allow him to hold the position of the president (the one occupied by Mesic now) which was sufficiently weakened by Racan, so it would not be any threat to Pasalic, yet Budisa will finally - at least figuratively - get that cherished corner office. HDZ may offer better options than Pasalic, though. Pasalic just barely avoided prison time for his involvement in various money schemes during Tudjman's government - because there was never enough evidence or witnesses around to indict him. But he is still likely to be called to The Hague for his role in the Croatian war crimes in Bosnia. With him as a prime minister, Croatia would be put in awkward situation (kind of like Serbia with Milutinovic). The already bad position would be made even worse, by having as a prime minister a potential war crimes suspect. And while it seems that Budisa is willing to sacrifice his country for his own personal goals of living in the presidential palace, HDZ may have a different agenda. They may want to keep the power once they get it back. So, they may offer somebody less internationally controversial than Pasalic is - like the Split's Sanader - a rather bleak and unremarkable figure so far, but with a solid political standing, wide support and basic economic and political literacy. Perhaps, Pasalic would even go with such an agenda - that would still give him behind the scenes access to power, while keeping him out of the spotlight. Racan, on the other hand, seems to favor more to have to face the Budisa-Pasalic threat than the Budisa-Sanader threat. He understands that he would lose either race if it happens, and he perefers to be in the future opposition to somebody who is already weakened - like Pasalic - with a history of financial machinations and possible war crimes connection. It is not clear, however, whether Sanader would be willing or able to pull this off, whether Pasalic would not oppose it and what does Budisa think of a coalition with Sanader. It is also not clear whether Racan would bow to the early elections threat. But it is obvious that Croatia is facing the great economic and political crisis, that the best female skier in the world cannot help to solve. Ivo Skoric # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]