calin on Sun, 14 Jul 2002 21:54:00 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Rejecting Prada is about art, not design |
I recently heard a journalist say: "we are -- by definition -- AGAINST". I think that this type of statement applies to art as well. Therefore whenever art was confined in narcissistic attitudes of self- contemplation (lately in the 80s), it has been necessary to act AGAINST that; and looking over to what was appealing to the masses -- design products, advertisement, club culture -- packaging in a word, was thought to be a solution. Now, when every event of any social surface is closing with a VJ/DJ party, and when art events are quite a lot about lounging, fashion parades and food catering -- it is time to be AGAINST, de nouveau. The ideological radicalism claimed by those consumer-disguised events is not enough to make them stay, precisely because this type of critique didn't manage to do much more than blurr further the lines between free creativity and commercially enrolled promotion. Even if just for clearing the air, art should be AGAINST. And that's not gonna happen if we are still trying to learn from the Pradas. We are in 2002, remember? Learning from brands is passe, it's from the previous century. Even some designers realised that, playing down their product oriented identity and focusing more on the performance character of their work, on its autonomy. Problem with the students is -- in deed -- that they find it more appealing to dive into technological issues (an area unanimously supported by the society which they learn to serve), than to do autonomous research, which requires a type of knoledge that low-to-high education seems to avoid systematically -- history, theory, general cultural information. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]