Florian Cramer on Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:55:24 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Josephine Bosma, review of Documenta XI |
[written by Josephine Bosma] Documenta XI: no laughing matter It was as if nature decided to complete the experience the curators of Documenta XI seemed to be creating for us. It rained and rained in Kassel and the rest of Germany when we were there. Streets were flooded and the temperature was way below what it should be in summer. One of the world's most leading art events can be described with one word: depressing. The most positive thing one can say about this Documenta probably is its openness to artists that are not white, male and 'western'. Documenta XI is depressing for three reasons (I am not even counting the curators' ignorance of current new media art). Firstly: the amount of documentary works and sad contemplations on the fate of second or third world people was truly over the top. There was an overkill of (somehow disguised) preaching which made one either grow irritated or totally uninterested after a while. Secondly, at Documenta XI the struggle around how to define art seems to have been lost in favor of anything that confirms our unfortunate and inescapable First World bad consciousness. One can tell the main curator Enwezor studied political science and has no background in art. It looks like critic Dave Hickey is right when he says (in a quote in a New York Times article): "It's basically a Protestant view of art". This is the Documenta of mostly useful art, almost everything has meaning and purpose. Enwezor's need to preach and teach then leads to the third, most poignant reason for depression: Documenta XI is above all dead and dead serious. There is very little humor or anything else ridiculous, useless or grotesque. Of course it is a relief to see a major art show which somehow reflects the way the world is opening up. It sounds clich�, but communication technologies and mass media culture -have- brought us closer together. Cultures have slowly started to mix and good taste is no longer defined by one or two elites but by many. We see each others faults better too. One of the things this Documenta seems to want to be is what its name implies: a -document- of these changes, a confirmation even maybe. But it does so in a highly predictable, lecturing way. As I said, this is the Documenta of documentaries, of useful 'art'. A video about a prison in Uganda (Zarina Bhimji), found footage with images of aboriginals re-edited (Destiny Beacon), a documentary about eskimo's (Igloolik Isuma Productions), so called 'new forms of cinema' (see earlier Documenta review by Lev Manovich) showing the situation around illegal immigrants in the USA (Chantal Akerman), a documentary installation about the tragic death of illegal immigrants (Multiplicity), documentaries on black communities (Black Audio Collective) and a number of works in which artists contemplate on themselves or their background (Pascale Marthine Tayou, Mona Hatoum, Eija Liisa Antilla, Fiona Tan) are mixed with grim looking pieces like an Iranian shop covered in tar (?) (Chohreh Feyzdjou), dolls in colonial cloths in all kinds of sexual positions (Yinka Shonibare), a room covered in soot (Artur Barrio), black or brown paintings (Leon Golub, Glenn Ligon), black and white films of empty or gloomy spaces (Stan Douglas, Jef Geys) and a labyrinth with 12 signs of depression (Ken Lum). The relatively large number of photo collections made the impression of Documenta as literal document of our times even stronger. Documenta XI is not just dominated by documentary works and melancholy or sadness. What is rather puzzling at this Documenta is the odd presence of certain 'old favorites' in the exhibition. One wanders from room to room filled with what I described above and then suddenly, slightly lost, there is a space filled with works by Louise Bourgois, Hanne Darboven, Dieter Roth, Constant or On Kawara. As again Manovich has reported earlier, it seems like some even got a retrospective. Even if these artists have made very interesting work (the unique Constant exhibition within another exhibition was a nice surprise) seeing them here made one wonder why specifically these artists were chosen (did a stubborn sub-curator squeeze them in?). At first sight their work did not seem to make much sense within what I would call the 'Documenta XI message'. Also interesting works by 'newer' artists or artist groups (Shirin Neshat, Steve McQueen, Atlas Group, Ryuji Miyamoto, James Coleman, Mark Manders, Tsunamii.net, Nari Ward, Simparch, maybe even John Bock!) got branded by their presence within this context. The political brainwash of the rest of the exhibition is so strong that it overpowers all works and leaves one with very little room for interpretation. The question then haunts you: what makes the work of these artists fit between the other works? Is it because they are somehow documentaries or analyses (tsunamii.net, James Coleman, On Kawara, Hanne Darboven), because the work is made of leftovers (thus a sign of our decadence) and trash (Nari Ward, John Bock), because the work offers new perspectives or contemplations on the spaces we live in (Simparch, Constant, Mark Manders, Ryuji Miyamoto) or simply because the artists who made them are not white and make (again) contemplative, melancholic pieces (Steve McQueen, Shirin Neshat)? Even if the works of the latter two fits in this Documenta perfectly I don't think they really benefit from it. The good intentions of the main curator, Okwui Enwezor, are beyond doubt. But does he know what he is doing, one wonders. At a discussion after a talk by Ravi Sundaram of the Sarai media collective Enwezor started to talk about copyrights. He compared the notions of authorship in Africa and the western world and decided that current copyright laws needed to be changed as if he had just invented the very idea of it. The way he talked seemed to reflect the impression I had gotten from the exhibition perfectly. The Documenta XI curators are simply behind when it comes to knowledge about art in media (which is where most copyright issues occur and are battled over). It explains the overwhelming amount of video art compared to the minimal presentation of art on computers for instance. Walking through the exhibition spaces there were numeral instances that I thought: "Wouldn't RTMark have said this much clearer?" "Wouldn't the Electronic Disturbance Theatre, Heath Bunting or Critical Art Ensemble represent this more appropriately?" "Wouldn't the Old Boys Network be able to cheer this place up in the most suitable politically correct way?". Tsunamii.net had been a pleasant surprise (even if the documentation could have shown a bit more in this case! After the performance had finished there was even less action at the Tsunamii site), but I was disappointed about the Raqs Media Collective. The presentation of the work "Co-Ordinates: 28.28N/77.15E : : 2001/2002" was very bland, even if it was glossy. Apparently the collective tried to present or recreate the streets of a large Indian city at the exhibition. A black space with a few columns covered in glossy colorful stickers and some flat TV screens showing crowds just didn't do the trick. On line the work looks better, but to call it a solution for questions around authorship� that seems a bit farfetched. Authorship is not a purely technical matter. Another web art work by Andreja Kuluncic (who, according to the catalogue made the most exposed Croatian web art today) requested for the audience to upload files to the site, which was impossible from Documenta. The work "Distributive Justice" is a good examply of old fashioned critical net.art, done with better and faster technology. What all three net art works share is a complexity that is often neglected in selections of net art for large exhibitions. The works at Documenta XI all extend beyond the web alone, and both "Co-Ordinates: 28.28N/77.15E : : 2001/2002" and "Distributive Justice" ask for what I would call a more intimate interactivity then the simple click of a mouse. This Documenta seems to be a message of change to all those who would like to see art as something which represents the so called virtues of the "free west". The problem is however that there are not that many people who really believe in those virtues anyway, especially amongst the European art audience. This message therefore only works on a meta level. Maybe it would be better to see Documenta XI as an art work itself, a project by the curators, whose message will probably resonate for quite a while after this Documenta has closed. It seems fairly sure that on the short term the Ars Electronica organizers were inspired by it. Their next festival called "Unplugged" will deal with the practically same theme (Does anyone still believe they really don't care about connecting to the art world over there at Ars Electronica? ;)). http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/02/magazine/02OKWUI.html http://distributive-justice.com http://www.opuscommons.net http://www.tsunamii.net/ http://www.aec.at/festival2002/ -- http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~cantsin/homepage/ http://www.complit.fu-berlin.de/institut/lehrpersonal/cramer.html GnuPG/PGP public key ID 3200C7BA, finger [email protected] # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]