nettimes_zeiten_sich_bespiegeln on Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:45:40 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> the importance of being rhizome digest [pocock, economy car] |
Fwd: <nettime> The majordomo panoply of other nettimes [email protected] (philip pocock) Re: Rhizome: Institution Lite Version Economy Car <[email protected]> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:01:32 +0100 Subject: Fwd: <nettime> The majordomo panoply of other nettimes From: [email protected] (philip pocock) Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: > Von: [email protected] (philip pocock) > Datum: Sun, 26. Jan. 2003 16:42:01 Europe/Berlin > An: Bruce Sterling <[email protected]> > Kopie: philip pocock <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: <nettime> The majordomo panoply of other nettimes > > there was a time i avoided nettime, a few of years ago, when so many > regulars were pumping the channel with the cv soft job-seeking sort of > info mails disguised as communication. if geert means by 'coming to a > halt' that the 'opportunity' function of nettime is over, i think that > is the case. however nettime is imho not ordinary at all at one end of > its bell curve and i enjoy scanning it and reading some entries. get a > chuckle out of the mail below. > > 'time is the moving image of eternity.' (Timeaus) nettime is perhaps > the reverse, flips Plato's formula and 'nettime is the moving image of > the times'. something like that. hope the issue of time becomes more > apparent as i feel it is the number one out-of-sync issue in our > troubled world. > > philip pocock > > Am Sunday den, 26. January 2003, um 02:38, schrieb Bruce Sterling: > >> Geert Lovink remarks: "The nettime project in my <..> the more we share, the more we have. - l.nimoy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 08:02:45 -0800 (PST) From: Economy Car <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Rhizome: Institution Lite Version I think all of us are trying to do the same thing here, which is make our work and find a reasonable way to support ourselves in a society which does not support cultural production. At the same time, I believe that people love to hate institutions, so maybe that's the sole reason that this rhizome debate drones on. But I think it's something else. While I agree with Cary that we need the institutions AND we must keep a critical eye towards them, I have to point out the irony of the fact that New York City-centrism continues even on the Net. Being a net-based institution, I don't see why Rhizome *has* to be based in NYC (very much unlike why someone whose primary venues are performance art spaces, requiring a material, corporeal presence, has to be in NYC--this type of work of course has good reason to be produced in a population center). So, when Mark Tribe's salary is published and it is a good $20,000/year higher than starting salaries at the institution at which I teach (which is not in NYC), I am not willing to say "yes, but poor Mark HAS to live in NYC and it is so expensive there." I chose a life outside of NYC because it means that I can enjoy a reasonable standard of living and make my work, and work for an institution that I can at least feel good about at the end of the day (I know, Are Flagan: you have some deep-seeded hatred of universities and academics, we are all evil in your eyes, please refer to the first sentence of this post). One of the reasons I love the Internet as a medium is because it enables connections among geographically-diverse people. But my point is actually much more simple: I think that Rhizome is elitist, has contributed to the creation of a hegemonic structure in what is at its core a non-hegemonic medium, and is not rhizomatic at all in its growth patterns. It seems that there are a lot of others who feel this way too. Charging a $5 "cover" will only further these attributes. So, I'm not interested. If, on the other hand, I felt differently about Rhizome, and they were merely asking for $5 and not demanding it as a prerequisite for access, I believe I would comply. To me, that is the simple heart of the issue, and I believe it's the reason that so many have posted on this topic. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]