geert lovink on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:01:30 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> wsis digest no.1 |
World Summit on Information Society Nettime Digest, no. 1, October 1, 2003 0. BBC: Sharp Divisions at Preperation Meeting 1. ITU press release 2. AMARC: Community media groups call for empowerment agenda at WSIS 3. Mosaic newsletter 4. Tunisia and WSIS 5. Monika Ermert: Dog fight over World Summit of The Information Society 6. Cusco Declaration 7. APC/CRIS Book on WSIS 8. HRIC Excluded From World Summit On the Information Society -- 0. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3148356.stm Sharp divisions over how to bridge the digital divide between rich and poor have emerged ahead of a UN summit on the issue in December. Delegates were unable to settle their differences after two weeks of talks in Geneva. Many of the poorer countries want the richer nations to provide extra money to help more people get on the net. Delegates are now due to meet again in Geneva in mid-November to try to iron out their differences. The UN sees technology as a must for developing nations to help them educate citizens, make them healthier and escape poverty. It has organised the World Summit on the Information Society, (WSIS), to come up with a global plan to ensure everyone has access to information and communications technologies. But talks designed to come up with a plan of action have revealed big differences between the rich and poor countries. One of the main sticking points was over who should pay for technology projects in the developing world. The other stumbling blocks that emerged are over the place of human rights in the final declaration and how the internet itself should be governed. Western countries such as the US see freedom of expression as a key part of an information society. But this is a sensitive subject in many countries such as China, which has a different idea of what a free media means. Concerns about human rights are shared by non-government groups, represented under the banner of Civil Society. The grouping brings together a variety of trade unions, social movements and other lobby groups. "If governments continue to exclude our principles, we will not lend legitimacy to the final official WSIS documents," said the Civil Society group in a statement. -- 1. WSIS e-card: World Summit on Information Society (WSIS): "Connecting the World" The Summit breaks new ground with a multi-stakeholder approach. PrepCom3 introduced a format for the Summit that provides for unprecedented stakeholder participation. Representatives of stakeholder groups will participate with Head of States and Governments at roundtable sessions and will have an opportunity to report directly to the Plenary about their Summit-related activities. "The importance of communications and access to networks is no longer just a technical matter, but a fundamental policy goal for every nation", said Mr Yoshio Utsumi, Secretary-General of ITU. Adama Samass�kou, President of the Preparatory Committee, asked the participants to move from "input to impact" in working towards the construction of a real "world summit of solidarity". Some 1,600 delegates from UN Member States, intergovernmental organizations, civil society, the private sector and media attended PrepCom3. For "Highlights" of PrepCom3, please click here http://www.itu.int/wsis/newsroom/highlights/pc3/index.html For an overview of the results of PrepCom3, please click here www.itu.int/wsis/newsroom/press_releases/itu/2003/prepcom3closure.html Best Regards; http://www.itu.int/wsis/ -- 2. AMARC-World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters NEWS RELEASE 26 September 2003 Community media groups call for empowerment agenda at WSIS Community media and other civil society organisations have called on United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan to ensure the World Summit on the Information Society gives priority to empowerment of the poorest people and communities in the world including support for traditional and community-based communications media. The outcome of the Third Preparatory Committee meeting for the World Summit on the Information Society has been deeply dissatisfying for many NGOs and civil society organisations involved in community-based media and communications. The low profile of traditional communications media in the draft documents and the absence of clear linkages between the proposed ICT infrastructure targets and internationally agreed development goals is leading many civil society groups to question the real commitment to development at the forthcoming UN World Summit. The present draft Declaration and Action Plan gives priority to the infrastructure for Internet connectivity whilst failing to address the fundamental barriers of electricity supply, literacy and equipment costs which will exclude the world's poorest people. Much is promised by the information society but the world's poorest communities face the danger of being left out by a vastly unequal access to the global communications environment. Access to basic education and electricity are required before the world's poorest people can benefit from new ICTs. More than half the world's population still lack reliable access to electricity. Basic literacy skills are lacking for 20 per cent of the world's population, especially women and girls. The most widespread communications technologies remain the traditional media, particularly radio. Community-based communications media have a crucial role to play in enabling participation, strengthening cultural diversity, promoting gender equality and supporting a more just and equitable information society that includes the voices of the poor and the marginalised. AMARC International Secretariat: T. +1 514 982 0351 E. [email protected] -- 3. Mosaic Newsletter (via Steve Cisler) http://www.globalcn.org/en/article.ntd?id=1707&sort=1.25 Mosaic 2, August 2003 - A Synthesis of Civil Society debates on the information society. Since July 2003, the WFCN publishes Mosaic, a newsletter presenting an overview of the discussions on the information society, especially on the WSIS process. The objective is to present different cultural and linguistic (English, French and Spanish) perspectives using about a dozen of civil society discussion lists and websites. This second issue covers the preparation period for PrepCom 3 and is available in English, Spanish and French. -- 4. Tunisia and WSIS Petition at the initiative of the WSIS Human Rights Caucus September 26, 2003 The WSIS Human Rights caucus publishes today a petition regarding the venue of the second phase of the World Summit on the Information Society in Tunis in 2005, and the nomination of a highly controversed personnality as president of the organizing committee. The text of the petition reminds that "the two principal objectives of the Summit, that is to say the struggle to overcome the digital divide and the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in the information and communication society, cannot be dissociated from each other", and demands that "the holding of the second phase of the Summit in Tunis is subordinated to concrete signs by Tunisia that it respects human rights and fundamental freedoms, specially: - the freeing of journalists and others held in prison for their opinions in Tunisia - the appointment of a personality who is not the object of opprobrium at the head of the organizing committee of the second phase of the Summit - the commitment to allow all civil society representatives from Tunisia and abroad to participate freely in the work of the Summit". The WSIS Human Rights caucus has expressed its deep concerns with this regard during WSIS PrepCom3 in Geneva (15-26 September 2003) to many governmental delegations, including the group of European Union member States and accessing countries during a meeting organized with European civil society organizations. This petition is published while the criminal complaint jointly lodged by the OMCT (World Organization Against Torture) and TRIAL (Track Impunity Always) has been shelved by the Canton of Geneva's General Prosecutor, with the motivation that "Article 12 of the headquarters agreement, which was signed in July 1971 by the Swiss Confederation and the International Telecommunications Union (which is holding the summit), provides immunity from arrest and detention for state representatives to the ITU". See the joint communique on the website of OMCT, a member of the Human Rights caucus (http://www.omct.org). The text of the petition, with the list of first signatory organizations, is available in English, French and Spanish on the Human Rights Caucus website: http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis The WSIS Human Rights caucus is pursuing the collection of signatures, from all the organisations concerned with the respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and of their major importance in an information and communication society. Press Contact in Geneva: Christine Ferrier, OMCT, [email protected], T�l: 00 41 22 809 49 39 Send signatures to Rikke Frank Jorgensen, DIHR, [email protected] Web site: http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis -- http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/33086.html Dog fight over World Summit of The Information Society By Monika Ermert Posted: 27/09/2003 at 21:06 GMT Geneva Prepcom-III was supposed to be the final preparatory conference for the UN's World Summit of The Information Society (WSIS) which takes place in December 10-12 in Geneva. All the loose ends should have been tied up yesterday when Prepcom-III, also held in Geneva, closed after two weeks of negotiation. Now organisers have hastily reconvened another meeting for November aimed at breaking the deadlock over the drafting of two key documents. If the impasse is unresolved, WSIS looks wrecked, and it is very unlikely that many heads of state will tip up in Geneva only to be associated with failure. Difficulties were to be expected from a meeting that for the first time sought to articulate a common vision of the Information Society, says Adama Samassekou. But the complete mess that was produced at Prepcom-III, was a bit too much even for the tireless Prepcom-President of WSIS. Neither of the two core documents, the Declaration of Principles and the Action Plan, which are supposed to be signed by head of states in December when WSIS proper convenes, could be finalised after two weeks of lengthy discussions. "Still we have made progress," said Samassekou, "in the sense that we now know what are the points on which we do not agree." The expectations in the Summit, promoted by the preliminary text of the Declaration of Principles, are high, promoting information and communication technology as the tool to achieve "eradication of poverty and hunger" and "attainment of a more peaceful, just and prosperous world." But there is a wide gulf of opinion over how this is to be achieved, with the governments of the North and South, the 500-plus participating Civil Society members (representing NGOs from around the world) and private sector representatives competing to have their say. What the World needs Now "The world needs to move to overcome the Digital Divide," said the head of the delegation from Tunisia, host country of WSIS 2, scheduled for 2005. Bringing ICT to the poor countries of the South shall help build up the Information Society for all and at the same time stop and revert the situation where rich countries get richer while the poor get poorer. The UN's Millennium Declaration is the blueprint for the ambitious goals of WSIS, highlighted by the fact that the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan is main steward of the WSIS process. But rich countries - possible donors - are sceptical about the "Digital Solidarity fund" proposed by Senegal's president at Prepcom-2. "We need some new ways of direct financing for ICT projects, but not necessarily another UN Fund," said Marc Furrer, director of Offcom, Switzerland's telecoms regulator. Here lies one of the major disputes of the Summit process, that Samassekou and his International Telecoms Union ITU)-staffed bureau and host country Switzerland must tackle. For Western countries, protection of critical infrastructure and freedom of expression are much sexier topics. "Free Media are essential in a Information Society," declared a US delegate at the conference. But the media paragraphs in the documents have as many empty square brackets as a Swiss cheese has holes. "Pluralistic and free" media and access for them to information are not welcomed in many countries. "We deal with different versions of what we call freedom or freedom of expression," said Samassekou. The media discussion was highlighted in a hot debate about the situation of press freedom in Tunisia. Representatives from the very active Media Caucus of the Prepcom have according to one speaker already demanded the replacement of a top Tunisian official in charge of organizing the summit in Tunisia. "I am personally convinced of one thing, that nothing over time can prevent the desire of people to live and to express themselves," said Samassekou, "modalities may be diverse." He hopes to overcome the media and human rights questions for free access by referring to existing documents. But while China in any case prefers to have the dominance of national law regimes mentioned, the US leans on the other site in adding "consistent with the need to preserve the free flow of information" to possibly restrictive paragraphs. Changing alliances While Civil Society representatives found common cause with western governments with regard to media freedoms, on the other hand, they blamed them for yielding to industry interests over intellectual property rights. Against interventions from the Business Sector - represented mainly through the International Chamber of Commerce - they argued for a balancing of interests. "When asked why he could see so far, Sir Isaac Newton replied that he was standing on the shoulders of giants. Imagine a world where those giants refuse to let him stand on their shoulders," said Georg Greve, president of the Free Software Foundation Europe, in one of the five minute slots that civil society representatives were given before governments started negotiating. Yet this road would be taken by barring access through layers of copyright regimes. After the end of Prepcom Greve said he was satisfied that Free Software is now integrated in the Draft Declaration and Action Plan as at least "equally valuable software model". Free Software and a balanced role of copyright protection were heavily in the interest of developing countries, argued civil society participants from the North in debates with their counterparts from Southern countries, who warned against concentrating on expert problems. In general the participatory role of the Civil Society in the WSIS is still very experimental and unsatisfactory from the point of view of the Civil Society members. "There was one moment in the second week when Civil Society members were on the verge of withdrawing from the whole process," says Karen Banks from APC. The sentiment was that promises to accept not input and impact from the NGOs were not materializing, voices from the Civil Society were not heard, and the common vision had been completely lost. In the small drafting groups the possibility to participate were unpredictable for the NGOs. Sometimes they could make a five minute statement and even stay for the discussions, sometimes they were banned. By the end of Prepcom, Civil Society members were undecided about how far they should disassociate themselves from the official process; the press statement was reworded several times. Members of the German Civil Society were outspoken in their criticism: "Governments listen", they wrote, "or leave us alone in the Information Age." In any case the Civil Society started to work on their vision document, which they want to present to WSIS in December. In other words there could be competing declarations floating around the conference/ Stake in the Ground Samassekou noted that Prepcom-III was an intergovernmental process in which the United Nations had for the first time opened up to observers. He hoped that the new "multistakeholder" approach would act as model for the overall reform of UN working procedures. Samassekou's more immediate problem is in getting agreement over the wording of the documents. On Friday afternoon the highly controversial topic of Internet Governance was unexpectedly raised again by the delegations of Kenya and China and the US. At that point Samassekou could be forgiven for fearing that the process could collapse. Kenya, China and other countries such as Brazil favour a reform of the management of global Internet resources, namely domain names, root servers and IP addresses. But the US and to some extent the EU countries support the current US-backed private model and don't want to see the ITU involved. "We are very, very, very far from a consensus - not only in Internet Governance issues," said a member of the Egypt delegation who had first brought up the idea of a stronger international grip on the root server system. -- From: "Graham Seaman" <[email protected]> The participants of the Ist LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF FREE SOFTWARE - LACFREE, meeting in the city of Cusco - Per� from August 11 to 13, 2003, recognize: # That Free Software is an integral part of the building of a free, fair, ethical and inclusive society, where people have the opportunity to help each other in mutual solidarity. # That Free Software respects the need to preserve multilingualism and cultural identities in cyberspace. # That the freedoms given to free software users make it easier for them to become active participants of the knowledge society and not just consumers of technology. # That the license policy of proprietary software is not sustainable for the economies of developing countries. # That the license model of free software represents an oportunity to achieve equality of rights in the area of technology, reducing the digital divide and helping users with fewer economic resources. # That the development that free software has achieved and the potential that it represents, is a clear demonstration that it has a strategic role in creating a knowledge and information society. # That the training of human resources with free, fair, ethical and inclusive thought is a basic requirement for society, and free software is an example of these values. Hence, we invite the international comunity, in particular govermments and civil society, including the media, to bear in mind during the preparatory work for and the realization of the World Summit on the Information Society, the following: * To recognize, take on board, and promote the advantages of the use and development of free software, as an integral part of building a knowledge and information society. * To create within states the political conditions for research and training which favour the appearance and adoption of measures encouraging the free flow of software techniques, algorithms, services, formats, protocols and other requirements of a sustainable and just knowledge and information society. * To promote legislative norms within the vision of a new legal international paradigm in favour of the use and development of free software. In the construction of this new context there shall not exist barriers to the development of programs which respect the four principles which constitute the pillars of free software. * To give priority to free software in education and health to achieve a scientific training as well as values of ethics and unity. * To guarantee the adoption of publicly available standards which can be implemented by free software in the infrastructures of both public services and networks. * To use the advantages of free software to guarantee the security, privacy and perenniality of information, especially in relation to critical infrastructure. * To guarantee the training of human resources as support for the development of the information society and in particular of free software. * To develop innovative mechanisms with international community support, aimed at entry to the knowledgment and information society by developing countries in equal conditions. That the treaties for economic cooperation and integration will be updated within this perspective. Cusco, August 13 2003 -- 7. Sender: [email protected] Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:47:32 -0300 NEW BOOK FROM COMMUNICATIONS ACTIVISTS HIGHLIGHTS PRIORITIES FOR WORLD SUMMIT ON THE INFORMATION SOCIETY GENEVA, SWITZERLAND, September 24 2003 - "There is little doubt that access to information and communications technologies (ICTs) is expanding, yet this process excludes the majority of people in developing countries. Many who do have access are unable to use it freely to promote their social, economic and political interests. When people gain access to these technologies, it is mostly as consumers, rather than owners or creators. The growing concentration of ownership and control of ICT can limit its remarkable potential for social empowerment," says APC in a new book launched last week at the third preparatory conference (PrepCom) in the run-up to the first ever United Nations world conference on the information society. At the United Nations' World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), to be held in Geneva in December, governments will agree on a declaration and action plan that could enhance or hinder access to ICTs for the vast majority of the world's population. The Association for Progressive Communications (APC) and the CRIS Campaign have been following the WSIS process and their publication - "Involving Civil Society in ICT Policy: the World Summit on the Information Society" - highlights some of the principal issues at stake. "The information society, we are told, is a promise to all the peoples of the world of untold benefits and promises for our future however the reality is often much closer to a nightmare," says CRIS Campaign Coordinator, Myriam Horngren. "As our mass media become more and more sanitised and commodified, our airspace sold to the highest bidders, our common knowledge and creativity get fenced off, we fear that the information society is solely promoting the expansion of corporate control at people's expense." Who is this book for? This book is aimed at people who want to advocate for more just and enabling policy environments. It is designed to build awareness of and capacity to engage in ICT policy-making spaces at international, regional and national levels, including the WSIS. What does the book include? Published in English, French and Spanish, the book includes a basic orientation to the WSIS for non-governmental and non-commercial participants as well as information about the CRIS campaign. It outlines APC's perspectives on the WSIS which emerged from broad discussions and consultations with APC members and other civil society groups from Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. It also includes the views of the members of the APC Women's Networking Support Programme, and draws on the collaborative work of CRIS and APC with other networks. Key issues (including a reflection on the term 'information society', intellectual property rights, and spectrum allocation) is covered by the CRIS campaign. A practical 12-page guide to organising a national ICT policy consultation developed by APC accompanies the book. CONTEXT "Involving Civil Society in ICT Policy: the World Summit on the Information Society" has been compiled by the Association of Progressive Communications (APC) and the Campaign for Communication Rights in the Information Society (CRIS). It is part of our combined efforts to ensure that communication and internet rights are upheld and protected as fundamental rights throughout the world. ABOUT APC AND CRIS APC: The Association for Progressive Communications is an international network of civil society organisations whose mission is to empower and support organisations, social movements and individuals in and through the use of information and communication technologies for social justice, development and environmental sustainability. APC's vision is of a world in which all people have equal and affordable access to the creative potential of ICTs to improve their lives and create more democratic and egalitarian societies. APC is a founding member of CRIS. www.apc.org CRIS Campaign: Communications Rights in the Information Society (CRIS) is an international campaign to ensure that communication rights are central to the information society and to the upcoming World Summit to the Information Society. The campaign is sponsored and supported by the Platform for Communication Rights, a group of non-governmental organisations involved in media and communication around the world. www.crisinfo.org For additional information about CRIS activities during the Summit itself, visit the World Forum on Communication Rights' website: http://www.communicationrights.org. The Forum will take place on December 11 in parallel to the WSIS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Karen Banks APC WSIS Coordinator Tel: +44 7712 553 582 Email: [email protected] Myriam Horngren CRIS Advocacy and Network Coordinator Tel: +44 777 185 6091 Email: [email protected] Ms Banks and Horngren are currently attending WSIS PrepCom III and are available for interviews. Graphics available: contact [email protected] -- 8. HRIC Excluded From World Summit On the Information Society http://iso.hrichina.org/iso/news_item.adp?news_id=1527 September 18, 2003 Human Rights in China (HRIC), the only organization devoted exclusively to human rights issues in China, has been denied accreditation to the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) scheduled for Geneva in December. The failure to include HRIC in the upcoming WSIS raises serious concerns about the transparency and legitimacy of this multilateral process and any meeting that purports to encourage the broadest possible participation. HRIC has called on the Executive Secretariat of WSIS to explain the reasons for this decision. HRIC, an international human rights NGO, has a 15-year record for promoting freedom of expression and the peaceful expansion of civil society. HRIC is an active contributor to international dialogues and processes, including recent accreditation as an NGO observer at the World Trade Organization Fifth Ministerial meeting held in Cancun last week. In August the Executive Secretariat of WSIS confirmed that HRIC's application was timely and complete, and that it had been sent for review to the government missions. Following review by the missions, HRIC was not included on the list recommended for accreditation. HRIC feels rejection of its application to attend WSIS raises the following serious concerns about the multilateral process: Inclusion of civil society entities: The official Arrangements for participation require that "the applicant is competent and its activities relevant to the work of the Summit." HRIC's mission focuses on promoting free expression and right to information. Our programs are directly connected to WSIS's work, in particular our expanded Web initiative promoting human rights, freedom of expression and the uncensored flow of information into and out of China. WSIS has the stated goal of examining, among other issues, ways to "protect the free flow of information and communication," "promote open and informative media, freedom of opinion and expression, and diversity of content and culture," and "stress the role of press freedom in the context of democracy and good governance." The review process by missions should not be turned into a mechanism for censorship and exclusion of independent NGO voices. Transparency: The list of NGOs and civil society entities recommended for accreditation to WSIS is dated August 22, 2003, but to date HRIC has received no direct communications from the Executive Secretariat regarding the decision, the basis for the decision or any possible avenue for appeal. HRIC and other civil society groups excluded should be informed about which specific missions raised objections, what those objections were, or whether there were other reasons for the exclusion of a particular group. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]