Alex Wilkie on Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:25:27 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Mitchell++ @ aa - placing us into... |
Bill++ Mitchell spoke at the aa (Architectural Association) last night. Presenting his new book 'Me++ : The Cyborg Self and the Networked City' to a 'prestigious' UK(?) audience. Hoping to get some 'urbanista' insights into how intermingling wireless telematics and corporeal-agency are being framed in the urban environment, I sat in the remote-video linked canteen with the kids - patiently tapping... Bill++'s deal is this: new technologies cause social fragmentation and dispersal. Centralized to decentralized social patterning (hard or soft technological determinism - you decide!) is taking place. Bill++s example: the domestic bath gravitated people from public corporeal cleansing to private...thus creating new urban conditions... The dispersed infrastructure of wireless networks is creating new fields, rather than points, of presence - communities for example can now have strong remote links. Portability is enabling resources to be accessed in these new fields of presence, however they also create fragmentation and re-combination. Where once computing and telecommunications was once attached to a specific place - think of telephone boxes - now places have become fluid and temporal due to portability. Thus a new layer (or layers?) of activity is being over-layed onto the urban environment. Where once buildings and structures framed activity, wireless networks are now seen as a key issue and resource for urban planning - opinion shared by recent Demos research (Harkin, J. Mobilisation. 2003). So, what do WE get? Well, we get a ROW attitude - a kind of: this is how we do it at the MIT and that's how we expect ROW to get it. New places - such as parks (what real function did they play anyway) - to find jobs, out of the panoptic gaze of the corporeal boss (forget sys admin track and trace here). New places - such as canteens (such as one I was tapping in...) to re-purpose as studio-work spaces (this should be done with a tablet pc by the way). And then...perhaps...dispersed forms of grassroots demonstration (he showed some well chosen googled-images here). And that was it. I was hoping Bill++ would provide some urbanista insights into political and ethical sites but grassroots was really it. Unfortunately sitting in the canteen I couldn't catch the drift of the questions and answerve session... What then, did I take away? Well, one thing is that the boundaries of subjectivity are not really being addressed. They are in terms of SRI style technological augmentation -body-technology dualism - but not in terms bodies as sites and topologies of relational socio-technical assemblages. This then continues the opposition of corporeality and space-time - a background into which we are placed....... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- March, 1981 Mr. Kenji Urada, 37, becomes the first reported death caused by a robot. A self-propelled robotic cart crushed him as he was trying to repair it in a Japanese factory. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]