Zeljko Blace on Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:33:23 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> * state support for media culture in Croatia in disfavor with recently appointed right government |
Dear friends and colleagues, on behalf of the Multimedia Institute (Zagreb, CROATIA) I would like to inform you of the decision made by the recently appointed right government and minister of Culture - Bozo Biskupic, to terminate Council for Media Culture and reduce the remaining councils to the role of advise giving bodies. Croatia never developed institutional frameworks for the development of media culture - though historically it represented an important part of the cultural field in the late 60ties and 70ties (both locally and internationally), and as of late 90ties took up again an active role in the international networks and co-productions mostly through a number of non-governmental organizations (such as Multimedia Institute), networks (CLUBTURE) and individuals. In 2001 the Council for Media Culture was appointed by the Ministry of Culture in order to deal with cross-field or new media programs, with numerous programs from the urban/youth culture and so called "alternative" culture (mostly non-institutional and marginalized cultural and art practices from various fields that were never included into the mainstream cultural institutions). In recent years a great number of activities in these marginalized fields succeeded to establish themselves both locally and internationally, while developing an independent infrastructure and networks for sustainable growth. All of these activities and organizations will now be in stressful situation to depend exclusively on local authorities and councils that are mostly focused on traditional art forms. Though the work of Council for Media Culture was at times problematic (particularily as concerns its focus and its efficiency) - something that Mr Biskupic uses in his argument -, rather than dealing with the specific issues of independent culture, he wants to terminate its representation and its presence altogether and claim his authority over the distribution of funding for culture. ----------------------------------------------------- press quote : http://www.vecernji-list.hr/2004/03/19/Pages/KUL-NAJ.html Government is cutting down on the number of cultural councils and the number of seats in them *Minister [of culture] Biskupic is no longer obliged to listen to councils* Council for Urban Planning and Architecture and Councul for Media Culture are being terminated ZAGREB - Cultural councils will no longer decide on where the state money for culture goes! Biskupic's reform of [former minister] Vujic's concept of governing the culture has passed the first hurdle - the Government. Now the draft of Cultural Councils Legislation can go into the first reading in the Croatian Parliament. Biskupic wants to terminate the Council for Urban Planning and Architecture and Councul for Media Culture, and he is introducing a Council for International Cultural Cooperation and European Integrations. Number of seats in a council is being cut down from seven to five. Councils will no longer be appointed by the Government, but rather by the Minister himself. And most importantly, so far councils were giving their opinion on the program of public needs in the culture for the year and on the financial support the Ministry would allocate to programs. The Minister was obliged to take into consideration these opinions, and in case of disregarding them, he had to give a written explanation of the reasons for doing so. Now the Councils should be in charge of proposing cultural policies and measures for their implementation, and making strategic decisions by helping decide how money should be allocated. However, if he decides to disregard councils' proposals and expertise, he's no longer obliged to provide an explanation to anyone. Councils will be also established for individual counties, the city of Zagreb and all townships with population over 40,000. Minister decides when the National Council for Culture as an advisory entity should convene. In the elaboration of the proposal of Cultural Councils Legislation it is stated that Vujic's [Cultural Councils] Legislation during two years of its implementation demonstrated deficiencies and inconsistencies. It is also stated that the mechanism of appointing council members was too demanding, that the Council for Media Culture failed to profile its activity, and that the National Council for Culture failed to pass a national cultural program, and convened no more than once. The new legislation also means that mandates of all current council members appointed by Antun Vujic to two or four years are being revoked. Denis Derk # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]