Aliette Guibert on Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:45:17 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Right of answer/ |
Sorry friends,=20 There is an exception depending the chance of the humor from certain = moderators of posting to nettime.fr actually. Who hold the property of = nettime.fr since the dissolution of samizdat collective, which they have = announced since any months ; they have never told it. While the list is = dying as media a bit more any day , we are loosing our major = french-speaking support arising the sectarism or partisan opportunities. = So we would need a great and generalist french-speaking list without = exclusive about other languages, but agreeing such as syndicate or = spectre from the most little to the highest or essays in art and in = any fields as local and global culture. But same time it would appear at last a strange shrinkage or indifferent = evolution of nettime-l. I regret that it would be rather impossible to = get a right of answer on nettime-l after anyway. While before this list = was among all the non-specialized lists on the digital development, the = communication, the arts and the philosophy, or even the sciences = compared to the culture, was the most opened to the critical political = vision. For example on "Empyre" they prescribe to post politics on = nettime-l.=20 But soon it will not have an object anymore except a single politics = (maybe) or the game in rappports of force towards a single tendency = which will be ready to merge all the thoughts not being their own one in = the treatment that it will reserve for them. We have already seen it in = the history which precedes us since the 30s till the end of the XX=E8 = century among which some people of us can still testify. If front of medias of the "Empire" re-centralizing everywher as power = since two years, we loose our alternative virtual but real medias or not = use them for the most, even defying control (we still are all = controled): what we could do or turning back to 1917 year ? Or you have = to invent a new strategy of desappearence of any posts from the server = lists to the global search engines. In which it could be a renewing = opportunity to get free front of the control of the control of the = control of thecontrol... and you see what I mean.=20 I tell for example on such a retort the one which I face below - but = that I can make on the other lists only, as I was censored after the = original post.=20 In a sense it is the second time at me, twice about Battisti (another = correspondent in Manchester had answered offensively and with a = particularly sensitive male chauvinist violence at the level of the = tone). Now I do not see in which name of fault from the Left bank - or = a selection between politically correct visions on politics thinking = that one insubmissed ansd especially insubmissed in matter of doctrin = would be abandon as equal front of extreme right on Right and Law. The = same historitical question repeating as a trauma on an anart and Lenin = and Trotsky division after the prime moment of the soviets. Front of enigmatics or unusual concepts or metaphore list nettime-l = privilege answers clearly reactionnary and one-sided thinking oriented, = that gives the last word on the posts which ask on the contrary for a = debate. The difficulty of the language itself could not be one of the moderator = options rather for a totalitarian formulation if it is clearly = expressed; that appears to me an ethical specious and corporatist = argument of selection from the ethnical point of view of fomination that = designs exactly one appearence of the multiform of racisme... Hope that I would do a mistake cause misunderstanding, really. Let us go = and see. Sorry on my English -I am just a little "bad" frenchie but in a defy to answer... Nevertheless as I try being understood. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Benjamin Geer" <[email protected]> To: "Aliette Guibert" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 8:42 PM Subject: Re: <nettime> Civil and human Rights (from indymedia) Me: <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]