z3118338 on Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:27:54 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> unix history |
Art I think although it was not totally clear I am not conflating the two but going back to original sources. The problem of conflation occurs with the free as in speech brigade and not me - sorry for any confusion - it was there conflation not mine I was referring to. martin On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:53 pm, Art McGee wrote: > > I find many unix/linux histories dont do this and as such > > seem to rewrite the history or gloss over things to fit > > into the free as in speech ideology. The Oral History > > really deals witht he basics of interactive communal > > computing and the way the machine was developed in a way > > these other sources don't touch. > > Hold up. Wait a minute. First of all, your conflation of the history of > Unix with the history of Linux is very problematic. > > It's not Unix/Linux, but Unix and Linux. <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]