Laurea de Ocampo on Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:27:59 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Transvergence |
Hello all- The idea of transvergence is one of the themes for the upcoming <a href "http://isea2006.sjsu.edu/">2006 ISEA International Symposium of Electronic Arts</a>. I am an undergrad at San Jose State University in the <a href "http://cadre.sjsu.edu">Cadre</a> department and am planning on writing a critical paper examining the idea of transvergence, and I wanted to incite a dialogue about the idea of transvergence and what it means. <a href "http://www.create.ucsb.edu/~iani/lab/58.php">Marcos Novak</a> has defined transvergence: In short, we conceive algorithmically (morphogenesis); we model numerically (rapid prototyping); we build robotically (new tectonics); we inhabit interactively (intelligent space); we telecommunicate instantly (pantopicon); we are informed immersively (liquid architectures); we socialise nonlocally (nonlocal public domain); we evert virtuality (transarchitectures). He has also posited a new "Soft Babylon," a theoretical stance which posits that our digitized architectural palette is causing us to create a wired Situationist city, while we struggle with some of the massive paradigm shifts that our era will and must face. Novak explains: "transvergence, in a pedagogical and research context, refers to the study and applications of concepts and methods by which convergence of disciplines, media and technologies is seen not as a goal in itself, not as the focal point of a predictable origin for divergences but as an opportunity to speculate and propose novel transdisciplinary epistemological and creative formations. Using willful strategies of derailment, it seeks to promote the mergence of previously unattainable but presently potentially viable species of efforts: future genres, future fields of inquiry, future arts, media and sciences". Does anyone have an opinion about what transvergence does that is necessarily different from traditional forms of social critique in art? What happens after the point of transvergence that makes a discipline different from its solitary state? When is the point of transvergence of value? What works do you consider transvergent? I look forward to your responses. Laurea # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]