| nettime's closed management system on Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:42:23 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: <nettime> Lessig endorses DRM [3x[ |
Table of Contents:
[Fwd: Re: <nettime> Lessig endorses DRM]
Heiko Recktenwald <[email protected]>
Re: <nettime> Lessig endorses DRM
Michael H Goldhaber <[email protected]>
Re: <nettime> Lessig endorses DRM
Patrice Riemens <[email protected]>
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:32:28 +0100
From: Heiko Recktenwald <[email protected]>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: <nettime> Lessig endorses DRM]
Hi,
> "In a world where DRM has become ubiquitous, we need to ensure that
> the ecology for creativity is bolstered, not stifled, by technology,".
> says Lessig - or [60]somebody purporting to be Lessig.
>
> "We applaud Sun's efforts to rally the community around the
> development of open-source, royalty-free DRM standards that support
> 'fair use' and that don't block the development of Creative Commons
> ideals," says Lessig.
>
>
I wouldnt say that this supports the subject.
He once designed an open source filter system as well.
H.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:08:10 -0800
From: Michael H Goldhaber <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: <nettime> Lessig endorses DRM
Just what is DRM?
Best,
Michael
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:45:19 +0100
From: Patrice Riemens <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: <nettime> Lessig endorses DRM
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 07:23:11AM -0500, t byfield wrote:
> It's fun to think about possible contexts where open-source means
> could be used to justify closed ends.
>
> Cheers,
> T
>
> < http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/24/lessig_blesses_drm/ >
>
> Lessig blesses DRM
>
> It's open source DRM, so it's good. Huh?
Strange, but not entirely urprising - if true bien sur!
------------------------------
With the ongoing onslaught of Anglo-Saxon (excuse the vagueness) law
worldwide, this is either very worrying internationally (as being
inescapable) or may serve as a wake-up call to take an even more critical
view of the whole 'Lessigian' edifice that has been in my opinion a bit
too hastilly embraced in some quarters (which does not mean throwing away
the baby, btw).
----- End forwarded message -----
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]