Eduardo Navas on Tue, 2 Oct 2007 07:24:35 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> [NMF] Blue Monday Review |
TEXT: Sumrell and Varnelis¹s Blue Monday. Book Review by Molly Hankwitz, co-editor http://newmediafix.net/daily/?p=1607 Blue Monday: Stories of Absurd Realities and Natural Philosophies AUDC - Robert Sumrell and Kazys Varnelis Barcelona: Actar, 2007 175 pages http://www.audc.org/blue-monday AUDC¹s book, Blue Monday is a provocative preliminary probe into the fall out culture of Empire from the perspective of architecture and urbanism. Today, American cities are suspended in a peculiar moment of variability and hybridization, and the book looks precisely at this aspect, yet from a distinctly informed ³outside² perspective. How is architecture impacted by networked technologies and what is, where is, where are we with respect to ³modernity?² Geographer Ronald F. Abler, writing for Bell Telephone Magazine in a 1970 essay entitled ³What Makes Cities Important², argues that ³the production, exchange and distribution of information is critical to [how cities¹] function [...] cities are communications systems.² (1, Abler in Varelis, 2006) and this very notion, the notion of ³cities as communications systems² seems to be the overriding thesis of the book. Bracketed thus, Blue Monday offers us not one city, but urban space as a set of glimpses of urban economies. Several vantage points are thus undertaken from which to review and observe the spectacle of the present. Varelis lays claim to a critical terrain from which cogent and important observations can be made. His critique also exudes a faith in the genuine social power of communication, thus raising the bar on our human potential to make judgments, individually or collectively, about what is ³good² for us and what will have permanence in these slippery times. The chapter, ³Swarm Intelligence: Quartzite, Arizona² best expresses, perhaps, the peculiarities of the critical problem. It is written through the lens of an ad hoc city, literally a gathering of retirees in RVs known as ³Quartzite.² The text includes a curious, brief history of the development of the RV in relation to the US Camel Corps, and characteristically urban categories such as ³the multitude² and ³density² are borrowed from Michel Hardt and Antonio Negri¹s tome ³Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire² (NY: Penguin Press, 2004) to help define how the notion of ³multitude², relates to larger constructs of sociality and power. The author writes: Multitude is the product of a transformation in industrial production from the fixed structures and hierarchies of Fordism to the flexible structures and distributed networks of late capitalism. (2, Varelis, 2006) He continues: ?the multitude is composed of individuals who can use technologies to communicate. To be sure, Hardt and Negri, point out, the multitude is made possible by contemporary technologies of communications. (Ibid) Bookending the author¹s central argument about Quartzite, a place he refers to as ³the capital of the multitude² (Ibid), the idea of the multitude can be better seen as an optimism; that this human formation desires to be free from civilization, while at the same time organizing as a place of trade, community, and cooperation and that this fact somehow possesses an important architectural truth. Quartzite is an especially seductive laboratory for the study of strange or ³absurd² economies (some based on the love of rocks; surely based on the fact that its population is largely retirees) because it lies at the intersection of the American love affair with mobility and consumption. One could suppose that Varelis has taken Venturi and Scott Brown¹s seminal 1972 text, Learning from Las Vegas one step further. Finally, he links Quartzite to the social interaction imagined in the Situationist¹s Hacienda as architecture. There, ³the concept of productive work is obsolete?In place of labor; meaningless exchange is maintained as a form of social interaction². (Ibid) Blue Monday reminds me of Hal Foster¹s The Anti-aesthetic: Essays in Post modern Culture (Bay Press, 2003) in which the attempt was made, very successfully, to articulate the genuinely best critical frameworks from which to view postmodernity. We are focused in the text on the ³post urban² and the ³exurban², the dregs of post modern architecture, which have morphed into a somewhat intangible new era. This urban space is apparently what the authors are trying to describe, frame, and grapple with. Are we, as Hardt and Negri suggest, so inside of Empire as to have lost our critical outside? Are we trapped in ³societies of control²? These are highly valuable questions, which the book posits in its pursuit and studies of architectural meaning. One way to answer them is to embrace, much as the authors¹ suggest, the absurd and implausible as critical elements of culture, the ³absence of productive capacity² at Quartzite thus, the value of human community which is found in superpower America. ------ Molly Hankwitz is co-editor of newmediaFIX. She is a writer and media artist finishing her PhD at the University of Queensland, Australia. She currently resides in the Bay Area, California. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]