Brian Holmes on Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:02:25 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Between Tracking and Formulating |
Hello Jordan, Greetings. Thanks for your response on nettime. I am glad you understood the point of my message and also that it is not an attack or something like that. I found the text totally brilliant. I think there is a lot of value in generating such knowledge, it has certainly helped me over the years, I could never have developed my own work without the insights yours has given me. I think I made that clear. I was just struck by this question of address and implication, so I thought I would be provocative! But also: this is a time when priorities could potentially be revised, when the US elects a new president and people look back over the last 8 years and realize it did not have to be that way. And it's so damn important that some of the major, underlying trends be seriously revised, it could be a turning point or it could also come to nothing. You know, I don't have anything at all against creative and open-minded people being what I called "part of the establishment." It's a very good thing, otherwise what happens to the everyday environment? Look at the places where all you have is neocons in there and the answer is crystal clear. What I mean is that since the breakthrough days of the 90s, artists and critics like yourself you have deservedly moved into top positions in the university and art systems, and it would be interesting to do something on the level of deep cultural politics right now. It's not just about a stance or a show of resistance. I think you have very much revealed the force of statistical population management devices and how they connect to the psyche and the erotics of the prosumer middle classes. What would it take to actually inflect that vast machinery of conviction and desire? Of course the logic of it is that there is no inflection, trends are supported, everywhere and in detail, by distributed means, in accord with scientific study and on the basis of commercial and military strategy. But how could people buck such trends? On what subjective and even erotic basis? In connection to which machines and discourses and habits of being? I think it's the question that has to be asked at the very level of work like yours, where it's serious and connected to the really existing landscape. Now I forget the intricate details of the text, but anyway I'd say the tracking of the overall situation has been pretty effective, it's time to formulate! best, Brian # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]