Sebastian on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:09:49 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Harv Stanic: ASCII: Amsterdam Subversive Code for Information Interchange. |
James Wallbank <james {AT} lowtech.org> wrote: >...but we remained open to new, innovative methodologies for sustaining >such projects. One of our questions was "Is it possible for a media lab >to sustain itself without a physical space?" Some of the organisations >we worked with wanted to test ways of existing that didn't rely on a >space. > >Our eventual conclusion was "No". What we discovered was that, while >you >can do some interesting activity with a peripatetic model (such as a >"media lab bus" or a series of ad-hoc meetings convened in other >spaces) >it's almost impossible to generate a wide feeling of community without >a >physical centre. A fixed physical space combined with reliable opening >and closing times are essential to encourage unplanned walk-ins by >regular participants and new recruits. > >Why is community so important? Why not have a series of cool events >delivered by a small core group to different people each time? Our >experience suggests that a skill-sharing network is only effective when >it's a community. When you meet people again and again, you learn from >them as much as they learn from you, so skilling them up with what you >know is an investment in your support network - while helping a >stranger >is simply an act of goodwill, without likelihood of reciprocation. > >So my question to ASCII is this: How do you maintain a sense of >community and keep the network together (and feeling, instinctively, >together) without a physical space? And how do you recruit new people >to >your community? I agree that a community is important, I agree on that you need physical 'space'. But not that it needs to be one stable location with set opening times. I share harv's idea on having a community without a space in a sense. I do think it is important to have physical meetups, but a space for this could be anywhere and flexible and moving. On events (small and big) you meet new and old people, and this can support a community. I think OpenBSD works in a way like this, based on online media en hack-a-thons. A space is nice, and sometimes functional. But a space limits the community aswell. It can often/usually require a steady flow of income and needs a stable 'institution' to run it. That is people with some dedicated communities. Also it limits as to where you have your meet-ups. And 1 place is rarely ideal for everyone. On the other hand, when having a large amount of small scale events. Anything from 5 people hack-a-thons to major 3000 people congresses. I do think you can maintain a community. You still need groups of people organizing events(not 1 group), but temporary spaces might not be as hard to arrange as permanent spaces. recruiting people in your community can be done just as well on events as in a physical space. I actually think it is more likely someone new will go to an event where content is obvious and maybe more interesting, then to a space where something might be going on. I am not against spaces, I like them. But I don't think a community needs to be dependent on it. What you need is communication in multiple ways including meetups. That's my current view on the situation, I think the concept has merit, but like a physical space still needs people working on it. my 2ct, Sebastian -- http://blog.u2m.nl/ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]