marc garrett on Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:48:41 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Has Facebook superseded Nettime? |
Hi Florian, Ana & all, I think that you have brought up something which is definitely important, yet at the same time I feel it highlights a difference of behaviours in respect of what people choose to do with their time when using the Internet. Regarding our own list 'netbehaviour.org', part of the Furtherfield neighbourhood of decentralized, nodes on-line and off-line; a while back we thought that we'd try an experiment in asking the list users' community, to move over to Ning. It is like Facebook, but there is more control. About 50 odd joined, but this left about 480 users still more interested in staying on the list. Because the list's behaviour evolves around open and free discussions in collectivley agreed terms, people felt that Ning was more useful as a project-related promotional tool of artists projects, rather than having both of these choices and more which was happening on the Netbehaviour list at that time. >For about two years, I've noted that a sizable part of the media >artistic, -activist and -scholarly community that makes up Nettime >has moved to Facebook, in the sense of being more active and >networked there than here. I am not sure if there is a virtual exodus taking place from here to Facebook, but I do understand your concerns. I have noticed various shifts and diverse movements and expansions, where peers and associates and friends have joined Facebook. Having said this, I have not noticed people leaving the list (netbehaviour) so to join Facebook instead, in fact it has steadily grown daily. I am not sure whether this is necessarily about 'either or the other', I feel that a closer observation shows that Internet users, whether they belong to this list or not are more expanding their uses of the Internet by subscribing to different platforms for various purposes and needs. Different platforms offer different functions and contexts to fulfill whatever reasons these may be. For instance, many who are involved in media art practice use Facebook as a promotional tool mainly to bring in new audiences to their projects, ideas, events and publications. Even though, I have not been a regular contributor to the Nettime list through the many years whilst, I have been involved in media arts and various connected practices. I have been reading texts and discussions supplied for all to read on here for a long time now and value its dedicated and disciplined approach of actively being engaged with the raw and critical contexts of an incredibly progressive and dynamic culture, of which we are all part of. It has informed me, questioned my assumptions and annpyed me, but it is special and unique and of course needs to change but for the right reasons. It's the community that uses this list that really matters more than whether it fits into external frameworks. Each list has its own agendas reflecting their own function, purpose and identity accordingly. I would advocate more of a crossover by many who use this list, not necessarily onto mainsteam platforms such as Facebook, this is going to happen anyway, but it would be useful for our shared culture, especially now, that we see each other more and become less isolated before we vanish into hermetically sealed elite groups, in competeition each other just because we behave differently when really we are part of larger context. wishing all well. marc www.furtherfield.org # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]