Newmedia on Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:26:46 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Deleuze, and (Which) Politics? |
Stevphen: Very interesting essay. What does it mean that the "people are missing"? Deleuze was, apparently, citing Carmelo Bene's remarks. Where did Bene's comments come from? Is this just a comment about political cinema? Or, might is literally mean that you and me and everyone else don't exist in some crucial sense? That the humans have disappeared? What might have caused this to happen? And is the use of formal causality permitted in the answer? If those who buy the Deleuze "brand" think they are marching with him toward making something new to replace the humans, then how are we to separate this activity from Eugenics or Transhumanism or pursuit of the Singularity? Indeed, what are the politics of striving to replace the human race with something "better"? Best, Mark Stahlman Brooklyn, New York In a message dated 10/6/2010 4:36:03 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: Deleuze, and (Which) Politics? Stevphen Shukaitis >From Culture Machine (http://www.culturemachine.net) . . . Deleuzeâs often-quoted statement that the people are missing. <SNIP> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]