Heiko Recktenwald on Sat, 21 May 2011 13:38:40 +0200 (CEST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> NATO disrupting the course of justice in Libya and International Criminal Court not reacting
|
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: <nettime> NATO disrupting the course of justice in Libya and International Criminal Court not reacting
- From: Heiko Recktenwald <[email protected]>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 12:54:03 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GWYaokkCver6X7JjdnZurDSLGz/iJJ0awJr4uGwAZzk=; b=Q91WOJeXCEId7towxLN8nOZhZbUNjKkAiQHfISSrqVUrniA4NklDVJiKfEozKmVD9n urCjwJBWcb363S0Ot5FCHrwdURl0m+m/F/jjlIIbov+82vPck8Pn/aYidEUWF54IlXh6 xGes9d0KSsiiYtlRidD5DvU1svLNDVwKYLb4k=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iQVbU20qzaniZ2BsnVfLyLgHiF0iin70XTbkAnJH11P9ghbpqiyv6yjZx3lTNNwgZD OcNzAZUCOFdwcildJrB/wzIARbJyiTmlWJ+9fZxWnOGox1e4TKV+I+EMb2Xh+B0Oyvt6 yO1e87fYlDsQOovlvvOSETbxUR2A+wJ1IHpHI=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
I dont think that international relations should be mixed with criminal
law if we want something like justice, real rules that govern all of the
times in all cases - and is there anybody who can give international
pardons, btw? - and I still have some sort of sympathy for the "devil",
but this is plain nonsense and I am surprised to read it:
Am 20.05.2011 06:27, schrieb Tjebbe van Tijen:
When a court orders an alleged killer to be arrested and it notices that someone else tries repeatedly to kill ‘their killer’…. it would issue also an arrest warrant for the murderer ‘in spe’ of the indicted.
It depends on the circumstances.
There are more important things to complain. The unwillingness of the
"rebels" to talk with him that I would call a barbaric uncivilised
behaviour, NATO does support this, and the definition of a "civilian"
anyway. There is no clear message what Gaddafi should do, the most basic
necessity for any rule of law, except to go which is not the content of
the UNSC Res.. And a prolonged civil war (that would be perfectly ok
unter the Geneva Conventions) is very expensiv
Btw, what does it have to do with art? It is about words and not images,
images suck badly, you cannot make anything "visible" in Libya that is
not political kitsch.
H.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]