Angela Mitropoulos on Thu, 4 Aug 2011 00:55:09 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Conor Friedersdorf: The Legislation That Could Kill Internet Privacy for Good (The Atlantic) |
There has been some discussion and analysis of this, in relation to the internet but also politics more generally, but surely not enough. There was the Livejournal Strikethrough of 2007 <http://fanlore.org/wiki/Strikethrough>. The Northern Territory Intervention in Australia (which, among other things, banned internet porn; and as it unfolds has become a series of significant reforms to welfare, generally awful ones) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Territory_National_Emergency_Response>. Some good discussion/analysis at this last year <http://lists.cdu.edu.au/pipermail/csaa-forum/Week-of-Mon-20101025/002859.html>. And there was, of course, the furor over the Bill Henson exhibition in Sydney a few years back. There are three books I'd recommend: Lauren Berlant's The Queen of America, which discusses the rise (during the period of the Reagan presidency) of a politics of the American fetus and the American child; Joanne Faulkner's, The Importance of Being Innocent: Why We Worry About Children; and Lee Edelman's No Future. That said, I've not come across a sustained history/analysis of this in relation to the internet specifically. I'd be interested to know if I've missed something along those lines. It's become so pivotal to the reorganisation of politics, welfare, communication, and more besides, that -- while I know that criticism is often circumvented by the more or less explicit accusation that critics must be defending child porn (or worse) -- I wonder at the rarity of intellectual and political bravery. I also wonder whether it's at all possible to analyse emerging forms of internet censorship without confronting this aspect. best, Angela On 3/08/2011 11:24 PM, Patrice Riemens wrote: > Kiddieporn appears to still function as the primary omnibus baseball > bat to smash 'the anarchy' on the Internet (with terrorism a good > second). But as with 'white slave trafficking' it will become > interesting to see when the concept itself that it seeks to > represent will come under closer scrutiny... -- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]