Newmedia on Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:58:03 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> The Revolution Will Not Be Televised!! |
Folks: I'm curious about why there is so little discussion, let alone *righteous* anger, about television on this list? Could it be that many of those who post actually want their thoughts and actions to be noticed -- by television? "Activist" often connotes those who participate in *demonstrations* -- so what is being "demonstrated" to whom and how? And what is the relationship between *demonstrating* and the evening news? "Terrorism" also makes no sense without television. TERROR has to communicated to a *mass* audience and that's where television comes in. In crucial terms, if it isn't on television then it didn't happen. OCCUPY began with a call from the glossy magazine ADBUSTERS. That always struck me as an odd approach. Fight advertising by coming up with ads against ads -- WTF? Do you *fight* brainwashing with more brainwashing? Do you combat psychological warfare with a "better" version of the same thing? In Gestalt psychological terms, this is phenomenon is well known and is often described in terms such as Figure & Ground. We obsess over the *figures* (i.e. the capitalists, 1%ers, police, church, state, etc.), while we ignore the *ground* of our experiences (i.e. television, mass-media, advertising, etc.) I've been hanging out with this crowd for 15 years now and it seems that the RADICAL roots of what is actually going on are relentlessly "off limits." What am I missing? Mark Stahlman Brooklyn NY # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]