Antonio on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:35:13 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> gentrification of hacking |
I am sure that many of your already read these articles or they know them by heart Nonetheless I feel like refreshing your memory: http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-reviewed-papers/free-software-trajectories-from-organized-publics-to-formal-social-enterprises/ http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/debate/there-is-no-free-software/ Also, since "gentrification" is the key issue in here, I would like to quote this passage from Blake in his review of Richard Smith (2003) work which I think could fit the ongoing discussion: "In actuality, networks may contain ubiquitous actants occupying fluid positions, who like Deleuze and Guattari's (1987) 'journeymen' and 'monsters' operate in relation to mechanisms of control but also retain lines of escape of their own. This can be illustrated by Neil Smith's (1992) analysis of the position of artists in the gentrification process. In the Lower East Side artists can be seen to have a meditating influence in gentrification, since low rents and government subsidy may attract them to an areas, raising its cultural image enough to attract gentrification. Nevertheless they have a ubiquitous role in this process, since rising prices may finally push many artists out of the neighbourhoods and some may therefore support activities from original residents resisting gentrification. At the same time however, artists may benefit from new markets created by the gentrifiers, leading to the presence of oppositional art in mainstream galleries. In this sense artists can be seen to occupy a fluid position in the networks linking gentrifiers with the established community. Thus they may be seen as an example of the non-conforming identities described by Star (1991: 39), in that they operate "between the categories, yet in relationship to them"." a. 2015-08-26 15:42 GMT+02:00 Florian Cramer <[email protected]>:   When Stephen Levy wrote "Hackers" in 1984, his description of hacker   culture and his write-up of the hacker ethic were, to a considerable   part, based on Richard Stallman. Already in that year, Levy called   Stallman the "last of the true hackers". Stallman created the GNU   Project in the same year out of frustration of what had become - or how   little had remained - of the original M.I.T. hacker culture. <...>
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]