Louise Desrenards on Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:24:30 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Fwd: the European manifesto of Varoufakis and Piketty |
Dear Patrice, chers tous, Thank you for your report. But what a sadness... Just to remind that everywhere when the radical left line was missing in the realization of the left wing at power, when the elected power was only acted by social-democracy, instead of winning in a moderate solution, it lost the way. When the social-democracy--the radical execution missing--lost its concrete program (concrete projects always linked with their symbolic social signification of exchange), thus they quit the State power leaving it waste away, but to be replaced by any sort of fascisms, always in the History. This comes from the disillusionment, this comes from disorganisation. This comes from disappearance of the alternative democratic solution (can be ideological as can be practical). Such is the paradox of Democracy that Tspiras having been a social-democrat till the end has made loosing the policy. But if not, he would have been a dictator. May be that the anarchist time is coming. You can not restore democracy when she disappeared, you can just overthrow the power that occupies it either by violence or by cunning, then create a new democracy with new rules. About Varoufakis. I think that the plan of virtual money conceived by Varoufakis (and Galbraith among others) which failed due to the impeachment to realise it, was very appropriate to the situation to hold the time facing the negotiation. If Varoufakis would not be this seductive personality to the media calling and this player even this sort of epic poet, and if he had not this sort of visual and comportmental gimmick that does not appear serious--even fetishist of technique--he would not the able person to imagine and conceive this sort of challenge--this plan surfing in between socio-materialist objective and virtual reality. That appears exactly a hacking from the scriptural money process, not the target to own the world but just a local precarious solution for waiting. A scriptural mode in other way. But a warm heart and a happy energy for the common despite the despair situation. But he was never at executive power because Tspiras has not given him the means of this innovative dialectical practice. Why exactly ? I do not care. But he missed the contribution of imagination to really try to help the Greek people. The risk was minor facing the threat. When Tspiras has accepted from the EU their rule to exclude Varoufakis from the negotiation, thus Tspiras has killed Varoufakis as executive member of his government, but he killed his proper authority and already by this symbolic sacrifice he has killed the hope of a winning deal. He lost. I know that Tspiras had not succeed to get the absolute majority, I know that he was obliged to accept some inconvenient persons to his policy into his government. Anyway he did not assume the symbolic. Having betrayed Varoufakis at the view of the EU executives and TroÃka: this situation has predicted that he was at the point to betray the people (the referendum result which faked the show was a event/not event). And that he was already defeated and that obviously he would make in sort that the Greeks will lost through the fact that being a looser himself. Toward the issue When EU executives and TroÃka refused to talk with Varoufakis, the duty of Tspiras was to put his resignation in the balance. That could be the good moment to conceive his resignation if he would have to be supported from a powerful reaction by the European left. Instead of that he trained all the European left to fail by solidarity. Look what happened to Iglesias and Podemos just after... Enough people ceased to trust them. The one having make loosing the common is not Varoufakis (as he was called to resign -- not because he wore special shirts or riding a titanesk moto) but Tspiras. Of course that is not the style nor the moto of Varoufakis which created a problem without solution inside the xenophobic EU but American consulting from dollarzone contributing to eurozone through Varoufakis work-- the trojan horse they thought). Not the dollar from Wall street but the dollar from the flexible rule of the Federal Bank of America (which stays linked to the Department of State) -- Stiglitz having directed this institution from which their chauvinist nightmare consists. Why Tspiras asked Varoufakis as economy minister? he absolutely knew his gimmick and his style. But he wanted to be conforted by the Nobelized American progressive liberal economists to support him thanks to the Vatroufakis relationships. From Tspiras a calling sign, not a real thought. Varoufakis has the thought of his practices -- organic practice from the virtuality into the social reality (not a growing reality from virtual reality, but the reversibility of the virtual reality outside the growing reality). From here there are a lot of hacking possibilities. That is strategy (exactly what macro-economy is). Tspiras emerges under a soft personage, but a pity for the common of us, a dangerous politician. He'll hold the responsibility of the rightist power at coming. I should prefer some adventurous experience from the intellectuality of "Indiana Jones" as a vitalist cognitive game. They would have attempted something new to win(even if they were in risk to loose) for the less. The missing risk of changing that lives through mostly Europeans credited to power is really boring. Mortifying. They enjoy the wars as their big work to expect that nothing more will happen. But death by murder to a large part of the people of the world. And now facing entropy of the migrations that they cause,climate changes included. But, except death threats against the life of Tspiras (what could explain such confusing decisions), this man was too much tiny to evoke the ancestral Macedonian of the minuscule country which won the battle against the Persian mega empire and from which Aeschylus has made a memorable tragedy ;-) As far the left wing looser it gives the right wing endorsed into harder authority against people disarmed by their professional democrats. On 13 September 2015 at 07:27, patrice <[email protected]> wrote: > I am still in Greece (Athenes) where I was with Lorenzo at a very > interesting and enjoyable INURA conference and retreat [1]. Yet, in the > circles I am with, Yanis Varoufakis 'enjoys' more than mixed feelings: > forceful rejection, which is due to the dramatic misfiring of his > 'flamboyant' negotiation strategy (though I did appreciate it allright). <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]