natacha on Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:39:37 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> literate programming |
Hey this is explicit in proposing a hyper solution, and it seems reasonable to think of it and to make it happen that way; Indeed it does not only relates to the logical problems that a program aims to resolve, but also it seems to speak about the necessary expression of the social and epistemological contexts in which a piece of software exists and that is most of the time kept as a hidden information. It would be also a very needed process to clearly reference the grounds of the decisions to a larger critical thinking path so those questions become a part of the software identity. This can only happen through more explicit trans-disciplinary collaboration and active engagement in development processes from different backgrounds. n. On 15/10/2015 17:30, Jaromil wrote: > dear nettimers, > > on 29 Dec 2014 through the public contact webform of dyne.org someone sent this > message to the hackers listening, signed as an anonymous "literate guy". I very > much feel like it deserves to be shared, as some of us here are busy with > thinking of code, power, governance, etc. <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]