Yosem Companys on Sun, 22 Jan 2017 20:30:25 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Nettime Survey (1995-2016) |
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:51 AM, David Gauthier <[email protected]> wrote: In the era of "big data," as a corpus, mailing lists are suprisingly understudied (perhaps it is because they are so small... -- your entire archive (1995-2016) is only ~210M and fits on my 2004 thumb drive). Nonetheless, we believe that legacy systems, such as open crawlable mailing lists (GNU Mailman/Pipermail/Mhonarc), may retrospectively, in the future, provide a more lasting historical record of digital culture than today's all enveloping corporate-guarded social media. David and Marc Absolutely. I was able to write a substantial part of my dissertation by using various corpuses of mailing lists and analyzing them qualitatively and quantitatively. See: https://www.academia.edu/27869809/Netroots_Organizing_from_Viral_Marketing_to_Barack_Obama_How_Berger_and_Luckmanns_Theory_of_Institutionalization_Resolves_the_Paradox_of_Embedded_Agency. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: