Alexander Bard on Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:39:14 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Digital leftism in a globalised world? |
Thanks a million for your lengthy and thoughtful response, dear Dan! Exactly what I was looking for. Cheers to lucky Madison for having you around. Well, I have been here at Nettime long enough to see people blame "neoliberalism" for the crisis in Greece when in reality those neo-liberal bastions the IMF and the World Bank largely sided with Greeks (due to Keynesian trends in economics after 2009; the IMF and the World Bank are after all only chasing the latest trends the way H&M and Zara do in fashion retail, they are not neo-liberal per se, bureaucrats have no predetermined ideology besides their own paychecks) while what crushed the Greek economy was the unwillingnes of German voters to bail out the Greeks (and consequently German and French banks). So are these German voters neo-liberals? Of course not. They are classical Lutheran social conservatives. Possibly even racist ones. But not neo-liberals or even any other sort of liberals. Neoliberalism is a comfortable demon. But it is to a large extent a non-existent one. Especially after 2008-09. I would prefer to see it gone in this forum (but that's just me). You see, there is a reason why I wrote "The Global Empire" with Jan Söderqvist in 2004 which was that "Empire" with all its naivities needed a proper both Marxist and Nietzschean response (Hardt and Negri wrote a pop book, not a work of philosophy). I still believe this to be the case and by now I also have the full support from say Simon Critchley and Slavoj Zizek. The Identity Left is dead (or at least should be). Jeremy Corbyn has been an even bigger disaster for British politics than Brexit ever could be (I personally don't mind a messy Brexit for people to realise what such a populist adventure costs). Et cetera, et cetera. So we need a drastic return to Marx. Blaiming "neoliberalism" again is no better than Christians blaming "The Devil" when they should blame atheism. And as for your excellent response, we also need a return to Freud. Because American voters already know all those dirty secrets about Trump that you list. And love him for them all. And will love him even more for the scandals that you and others try to provoke. Rather prepare yourself for a battle between Trump vs Madonna in the 2020 election, because that is where the social media-heavy United States is heading next. To understand this scenario, you need Freud. Why do people love to lick the ass if power? Now, mix Freud with Marx and what do you get? The Frankfurt School. That is where at least I am today. Meanwhile, Picketty's mistake is to think that people (and even more so corporations) CAN be taxed in the future. We are all digital-savvy enough on this list to see what is really happening: Ethereum will release its next generation of memes and software this year, the z-cash-driven web browser is just around the corner. National currencies may very well be obsolete within a decade. And with it nation-state taxation. And with that the last remnants of the classic Picketty-driven Left is gone, the hope for a fairer heavy-taxed nation-state. Am I a neo-liberal saying this? Am I illusionary? No, of course not. I'm just trying to ground The Leftist discourse in reality. Any other option is just a Freudian pervserse enjoyrment of our own hopeless predicament. And THAT I do not buy. I am not a lazy leftist literature professor more concerned with keeping my paycheck than with a better fairer future for humanity. So where do we go then? My response is to reach for the utopian skies and go all the way for a global democracy. Through an enlightened and if you say so Maxist spirituality. Syntheism, Alter Ego in the UK, the Pirates, all these new phenomena point towards a plurarchic radicality that I'm all in favour of. I wish more of it on Nettime too. Because otherwise the world will be ruled for the next 100 years by The Libertarian Netocracy coming from out of Silicon Valley, the real Washington. And do they care about democracy? Of course not. Because here we actually have the first new elite in history for some 500 years that can afford to ignore democracy completely. Just google Peter Thiel and Palantir and there you go. The blue collars of Michigan do not see this yet, but we should. The Liberatarians do not even need an ideology such as neo-liberalism to gain power. They just use their technologies and not only capitalise on human relations, they tinderfy them. This is the world of pure attentionalism. Isolated human robot-like entities infantilised into a world of computer games and thousands of hours of internet porn. With bigger class divisions than ever. So what is our response? Do you have a heart? Well, then start building monasteries. Because this is really the new middle ages. The global empire. A plurarchic empire without a head. And if you don't want to read my books (es, I hate anything that smacks self-promotion too), then check out Critchley's "The Faith of The Faithless" for a start. Zizek's "Less Than Nothing" is brilliant too. The Frankfurt School 2.0 - the digital version, anyone? Best intentions Alexander Bard 2017-01-29 23:50 GMT+01:00 Dan S. Wang <[email protected]>: Alexander, a late reply to your original post and later: >>Can we please raise the quality of postings on this forum to at least >>slightly above the junior high school level? >>Best intentions from Cape Town I accept your best intentions. A provocation in a spirit of impatience and with a sense of urgency is just what I want now. Thank you. That said, you went to a different junior high than I did. <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: