| Flick Harrison on Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:25:39 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: <nettime> 'Charging Bull' vs 'Fearless Girl' |
Wow! That’s hilarious. But this copyright statute:
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 02:32 , Felix Stalder <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>
> Siegel pointed to a 1990 copyright statute that grants visual artists
> the right “to prevent any intentional distortion, mutilation or other
> modification of that work which would be prejudicial to [the artist’s]
> reputation”.
Seems like such a broad statute could apply to the performance artist standing in front of Dana Shutz’s painting in the Whitney. Sounds like a fun angle from which to continue drawing out that drama.
--
* WHERE'S MY ARTICLE, WORLD? http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Flick_Harrison <http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Flick_Harrison>
* FLICK's WEBSITE:
http://www.flickharrison.com <http://www.flickharrison.com/>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ZeroForConduct/~6/2>
↑ Grab this Headline Animator <http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/headlineanimator/install?id=90rffbei3nr88m9ci3u0qr9d14&w=2>
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: