Patrice Riemens on Sat, 24 Nov 2018 14:20:30 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Seth Abramson: We need a new kind of journalism (Guardian) |
True, but I believe that the problem that Seth Abramson points out is that as a consequence of de-funding investigative journalism by the big mainstream media a gap arises between day-to-day news (& instant analysis) journalism and historians, who usually come several years after the events. Of course, books are also published covering a particular situation in depth (?) quite soon, like his, but then there too, rushing to publish may leave big lapses, of fact maybe , but even more of interpretation/contextualisation.
On 2018-11-24 13:50, David Garcia wrote:
Assuming there is any truth in the hoary old cliche that "journalism is the first rough draft of history" then how does Abramson’s notion of “curatorial journalism” differ from the role of historian? The act he describes of "going beyond a recitation of the facts reliably sourced, to establishing a readily digestible narrative that establishes how and why we have come to the point we have – without sacrificing the complexities of the subject” sounds to me a lot like taking a few steps along the way to the writing of history. Do we actually gain anything by way of insight or illumination by introducing the term “curatorial” to the methods and the journey that take us from journalism to history.. And isnt this another sign that "curatorial” is rapidly becoming an overextended concept in danger of losing all meaning. David Garcia On 24 Nov 2018, at 10:41, Patrice Riemens <[email protected]> wrote:In each of these cases, what is needed is not just a recitation of facts but an encompassing, reliably sourced, readily digestible narrative that establishes how and why we have come to the point we have – without sacrificing the complexities of the subject. Done well, the result of all this compiling, connecting and synthesizing will be not just a thorough history but also the production of new knowledge on each of these critical topics. Advertisement In this way, curatorial journalism can help ameliorate the deficits of understanding our digital age inevitably produces, leaving us not just better informed but also more trusting of the work done by our most deeply committed investigative reporters. Here’s hoping this new subgenre of new media journalism continues to inform us at this critical juncture in history and perhaps, in time, gets its due.# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: